Teams

Sun sets

Spring Adult 65 & Over Doubles · 6.0 Women 65s

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-14vs Great GetsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Forson / Sue Sammons vs Celia Youngren / Janet Wargo6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Manley / Janet Groner vs Virginia Hatch / Debra Alpern2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Mcwhorter / Nancy Guggenbickler vs Marcie Merrell / Ellen Wahlers6-2, 7-6
2026-06-07vs Great GetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSally Aveni / Cindy Forson vs Lynette Doughty / Linda Warner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Davis / Kathy Mcwhorter vs Celia Youngren / Ellen Wahlers6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEglia Flores / Janet Groner vs Janet Wargo / Martha Ware7-6, 6-1
2026-05-31vs Great GetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Forson / Sue Sammons vs Lynette Doughty / Celia Youngren7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargaret Manley / Sally Aveni vs Virginia Hatch / Debra Alpern1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Mcwhorter / Jacqueline Davis vs Martha Ware / Janet Arnold6-4, 6-3
2026-05-17vs Great GetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Davis / Kathy Mcwhorter vs Celia Youngren / Linda Warner5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSue Sammons / Cindy Forson vs Sheri Gallo / Janet Arnold7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSally Aveni / Eglia Flores vs Lynette Doughty / Janet Wargo4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-08vs Great GetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Coggin / Jacqueline Davis vs Sheri Gallo / Janet Arnold7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSally Aveni / Pam Helge vs Virginia Hatch / Debra Alpern3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Forson / Margaret Manley vs Celia Youngren / Linda Warner4-6, 5-7
2026-05-03vs Great GetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Forson / Nancy Guggenbickler vs Celia Youngren / Janet Arnold3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDiana Coggin / Jacqueline Davis vs Charlsa Bentley / Lynette Doughty4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Aveni / Pam Helge vs Ellen Wahlers / Marcie Merrell6-0, 6-2
2026-04-26vs Great GetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Aveni / Pam Helge vs Marcie Merrell / Martha Ware6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Davis / Diana Coggin vs Charlsa Bentley / Janet Wargo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Forson / Sue Sammons vs Debra Alpern / Virginia Hatch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-19vs Great GetsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Forson / Sue Sammons vs Sheri Gallo / Janet Arnold4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMargaret Manley / Sally Aveni vs Charlsa Bentley / Lynette Doughty7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Groner / Pam Helge vs Linda Warner / Celia Youngren6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Women 65s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sun sets6215922215
2Great Gets2691533257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Cindy Forson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Diana Coggin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Margaret Manley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.61
Eglia Flores
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Janet Groner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Kathy Mcwhorter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jacqueline Davis
published
Nancy Guggenbickler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Helge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Aveni
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Sue Sammons
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Forson + Nancy Guggenbickler2643% gamesnot enough data
Pam Helge + Sally Aveni3452% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Forson + Sue Sammons4158% gamesnot enough data
Pam Helge + Sue Sammons314 matchesnot enough data
Eglia Flores + Margaret Manley213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Mcwhorter + Nancy Guggenbickler123 matchesnot enough data
Sally Aveni + Margaret Manley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Forson
23W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Diana Coggin
62W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Margaret Manley
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Eglia Flores
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Janet Groner
51W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Kathy Mcwhorter
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jacqueline Davis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Guggenbickler
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pam Helge
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Aveni
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sue Sammons
58W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.