Teams

Bearkittens

2025 Tri Level Men · Gold: 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

4 players · average NTRP 4.25 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-23vs BING: AmigosWon 20
W#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Ryan Xia vs Daniel Williams / Justin Salkin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmmanuel Bellido / Jeet Shahani vs Dustin Tang-Chung / Harsh Patel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-16vs BING: AmigosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Xia / Jasen Fici vs Justin Salkin / Adam Lewczuk6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeet Shahani / Emmanuel Bellido vs Daniel Williams / Dustin Tang-Chung6-3, 6-4
2025-11-08vs BING: AmigosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Nolan Surbeck vs Shawn James / Adam Lewczuk2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmmanuel Bellido / Jeet Shahani vs Daniel Williams / Harsh Patel6-1, 6-1
2025-11-02vs BING: AmigosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmmanuel Bellido / Ryan Xia vs Evan Vail / Mason Spottek1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeet Shahani / Nolan Surbeck vs Benjamin Kammerman / Daniel Williams1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-19vs BING: AmigosSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSebastian Giurca / Ryan Xia vs Shawn James / Daniel Williams7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeet Shahani / Emmanuel Bellido vs Benjamin Kammerman / Joseph Hommel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-28vs BING: AmigosLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeet Shahani / Ryan Xia vs Shawn James / Mason Spottek1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmmanuel Bellido / Clinton Chan vs Daniel Williams / Joseph Hommel1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Gold: 4.5, 4.0, 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BING: Amigos5112614100
2Bearkittens1561227184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jasen Fici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Ryan Xia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emmanuel Bellido
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Jeet Shahani
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emmanuel Bellido + Jeet Shahani6160% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jasen Fici
102W–226L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
Ryan Xia
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Emmanuel Bellido
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeet Shahani
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.