Teams

LCTA18/Rehder/Hamlin

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs LCTA18/Stribling/MaybankSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarian Wolff vs Emma Hillary6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJennifer Mather vs Amanda Benepe2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKyrsten Morrow vs Linda-Triin Ait3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShauna Harris vs Minhthu Nguyen0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesBliss Lansing vs Aimee Hoffman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-30vs LCTA18/Nipp/MPRLost 12
L#1 SinglesMarian Wolff vs Stella Coulson1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShauna Harris vs Sinai Zyblewski1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLori Wisiackas vs Lauren Cason1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-23vs LCTA18/Anderson/CTCLost 12
W#1 SinglesKyrsten Morrow vs Irina Pevzner6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMarian Wolff vs Natalie Quinchia3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Mather vs Jenne Hays5-7, 4-6
2026-05-16vs LCTA18/Williams/DICLost 03
L#1 SinglesBliss Lansing vs Bria Williams2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLori Wisiackas vs Courtney Moskowitz2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKimi Dail vs Debbie OBrien0-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs LCTA18/Miller/Dunes WestLost 03
L#1 SinglesJessica Sciortino vs Christy Miller1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJulia Rehder vs Michelle MacKes4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKimi Dail vs Kayla Davis0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Julia Rehder
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Kyrsten Morrow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.66
Marian Wolff
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Jennifer Mather
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.57
Lori Wisiackas
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.54
Shauna Harris
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Bliss Lansing
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.38
Jessica Sciortino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.00
Kimi Dail
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Rehder
50W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Kyrsten Morrow
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Marian Wolff
47W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Jennifer Mather
33W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Lori Wisiackas
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Shauna Harris
34W–82L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Bliss Lansing
10W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jessica Sciortino
37W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Kimi Dail
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.