Teams

LLHA-Haberman-Richmond/Bailey

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 6.5 Women 18s

13 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs LAMA-Marin/Bailey 18s 6.5 Wed pmWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Rand / Natalie Brescian vs Anna Bonham / Lisa Turley6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Melby / Sylvia Sullivan vs Christine Cantello / Carol Cousins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaylin Scher / Erica Howard vs Sarah Goddard / Lindsay Marin3-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs LSBR-Brynn/BRPWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Rand / Erin Lee vs Cindy Japec / Tiffani Japec6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTia Allocco / Leenee Roberge vs Mandy Tirabassi / Liz Cloninger4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Miller / Valerie Richmond vs Laurie Watson / Mary Clare Hainsworth6-0, 6-2
2026-08-12vs LKRO-Rogers/WestportLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Haberman / Lia Smith vs Carrie Davin / Marilou Martin4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Lee / Leslie Shaw vs Vera Hoffman / Whitney King1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesErica Howard / Valerie Richmond vs Sheila Chast / Tracy Reiser4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 6.5 Women 18s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLBA-Bartolucci/River Run2051446
2LSPE-Pensler-Barber/Edgemoor1030011
3LJWO-Wolters-Ahern/Trump1021216
4LCRO-Russo-Rowland/Jetton1021223
5LMCO-Collins/Westport1021325
6LLME-Mele/Jetton1142446
7LAMA-Marin/Bailey 18s 6.5 Wed pm1142643
8LKRO-Rogers/Westport1124852
9LLHA-Haberman-Richmond/Bailey1133855
10LTAZ AZAMOVA 6.5FR/CRP000000
11LSBR-Brynn/BRP0112429
12LJFR-Frye-Pangilinan/Bailey0112533
13LTKR-Krohn/LNRC02151062
14LSNI-Niblack-Siler/Jetton02061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Kaylin Scher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Leah Rand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sylvia Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Lia Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Leenee Roberge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Valerie Richmond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Natalie Brescian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Tia Allocco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Jennifer Melby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Erica Howard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Kristen Nardone
published 3
2.70
Leslie Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Lindsey Haberman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lia Smith + Leenee Roberge1833% gamesnot enough data
Leenee Roberge + Leah Rand1440% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Nardone + Leenee Roberge134 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Shaw + Sylvia Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kaylin Scher
50W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Leah Rand
84W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Sylvia Sullivan
106W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lia Smith
67W–88L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Leenee Roberge
50W–92L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Valerie Richmond
44W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Natalie Brescian
57W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Tia Allocco
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jennifer Melby
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Erica Howard
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Kristen Nardone
46W–76L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
Leslie Shaw
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Lindsey Haberman
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.