Teams

Racquet Club

2026 FALL A55&O · FALL Adult 55&Over Women 6.0 Wednesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-10vs WedgewoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Bisca / Carole Wissman vs Sue Boudreau / Julie Jones6-3, 6-5
W#2 DoublesJane Freer / Carol Sweeney vs Connie Schmidt / Pamela Hutchinson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonna Baney / Judy Smith vs Heidi Bailey / Allison Wilson1-6, 4-6
2025-12-03vs ElysiumLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Bisca / Carol Sweeney vs Kelly Ackert / Susan Grunert0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCindi Haney / Ann Schuman vs Marsha Friedli / Diane Holland2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrigitte McKinley / Geetha Rivera vs Sara Howard / Shelley Walter3-6, 3-6
2025-11-19vs OlympicLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Stephanie Bisca vs Georgann Long / Sara Harris4-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesBrigitte McKinley / Geetha Rivera vs Cynthia Pawlarczyk / Robbin Northrop0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDebbie Dieringer / Ann Schuman vs Kathy Breen / Linda Augspurger7-6, 2-4, 1-0
2025-10-29vs WedgewoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Bisca / Jane Freer vs Connie Schmidt / Carol Roy6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Carole Wissman vs Sue Boudreau / Julie Jones7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrigitte McKinley / Geetha Rivera vs Deborah Nunley / Margo Simmons6-3, 6-1
2025-10-22vs ElysiumLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Bisca / Carole Wissman vs Cynthia Humphry / Susan Grunert0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Donna Baney vs Annette Wiblin / Kelly Ackert2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Bowers / Tracy Steinbrenner vs Toni Block / Sara Howard0-6, 1-6
2025-10-15vs OlympicLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Bisca / Jane Freer vs Joy Hale / Sara Harris3-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Carole Wissman vs Linda Augspurger / Robbin Northrop6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Steinbrenner / Ann Schuman vs Nancy Russell / Deborah Marks2-6, 2-6
2025-10-08vs WedgewoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Cindi Haney vs Connie Schmidt / Carol Roy1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Baney / Judy Smith vs Deborah Nunley / Julie Jones6-7, 4-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Bowers / Geetha Rivera vs Margo Simmons / Jody Penrod6-2, 6-3
2025-10-01vs ElysiumLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Bisca / Carole Wissman vs Diane Holland / Marsha Friedli6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Sweeney / Cindi Haney vs Sara Howard / Susan Grunert1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrigitte McKinley / Geetha Rivera vs Deborah Ellis / Jennifer Houser1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL Adult 55&Over Women 6.0 Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Sweeney
published 3
2.73
Stephanie Bisca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Geetha Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.65
Carole Wissman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Ann Schuman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Jane Freer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Donna Baney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Brigitte McKinley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Debbie Dieringer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Marlene Eymann
published
2.57
Cindi Haney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Tracy Steinbrenner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Lynn Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Bisca + Carole Wissman4250% games+4.1% vs expected
Cindi Haney + Carole Wissman8356% games+2.9% vs expected
Stephanie Bisca + Jane Freer4843% games−3.9% vs expected
Brigitte McKinley + Carole Wissman3745% games−6.2% vs expected
Marlene Eymann + Jane Freer0830% gamesnot enough data
Brigitte McKinley + Cindi Haney2351% gamesnot enough data
Brigitte McKinley + Tracy Steinbrenner0534% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Bisca + Tracy Steinbrenner2357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carol Sweeney
27W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Bisca
120W–127L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Geetha Rivera
10W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Carole Wissman
46W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Ann Schuman
42W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Jane Freer
36W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Donna Baney
48W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Brigitte McKinley
64W–86L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Debbie Dieringer
28W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Marlene Eymann
24W–53L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Cindi Haney
50W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Tracy Steinbrenner
44W–130L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Lynn Bowers
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.