Teams

CONCORD COMM PK CW6.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesYvonne Merrick / Mary Benin vs Minh Cannon / Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hellmann / Carol Pillsbury vs Caitlin Stahle / Mary Soe0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTheresa Quinlan / Lori Davis vs Leah Vachani / Kristen Steinert6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesBecky Reiss / Mary Benin vs Kathy Maratukulam / Ashley Edmonds2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDolores Schmidt / Lori Davis vs Minh Cannon / Miwa Yoneyama4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Quinlan / Carol Pillsbury vs Rebecca Kay / Valerie Epting4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMary Benin / Theresa Quinlan vs Yeh-Won Hunt / Valerie Epting1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hellmann / Carol Pillsbury vs Kris Courtney / Kristen Steinert1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBecky Reiss / Lori Davis vs Miwa Yoneyama / Maria Rueda1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesYvonne Merrick / Carol Pillsbury vs Leah Vachani / Maria Rueda0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hellmann / Lori Davis vs Rebecca Kay / Mary Soe6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Benin / Becky Reiss vs Kris Courtney / Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesDebbie Hellmann / Sally van Oosbree vs Miwa Yoneyama / Maria Rueda0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDolores Schmidt / Lori Davis vs Yeh-Won Hunt / Ashley Edmonds6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Kiefer / Mary Benin vs Kris Courtney / Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDolores Schmidt / Mary Benin vs Rebecca Kay / Miwa Yoneyama1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Merrick / Carol Pillsbury vs Caitlin Stahle / Mary Soe2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDee Hopfenspirger / Lori Davis vs Kathy Maratukulam / Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTheresa Quinlan / Sally van Oosbree vs Lang Lindsay / Maria Rueda2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Kiefer / Lori Davis vs Diana Corbin / Michelle Gonzales1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJane Liles / Carol Pillsbury vs Yeh-Won Hunt / Ashley Edmonds4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesTheresa Quinlan / Mary Benin vs Lang Lindsay / Michelle Gonzales5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYvonne Merrick / Sally van Oosbree vs Maria Rueda / Rebecca Kay0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Hellmann / Lori Davis vs Kathy Maratukulam / Miwa Yoneyama2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDolores Schmidt / Lori Davis vs Kathy Maratukulam / Valerie Epting3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Quinlan / Sally van Oosbree vs Diana Corbin / Michelle Gonzales1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Benin / Yvonne Merrick vs Lang Lindsay / Mary Soe3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMary Benin / Yvonne Merrick vs Leah Vachani / Valerie Epting1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTheresa Quinlan / Sally van Oosbree vs Diana Corbin / Kristen Steinert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDee Hopfenspirger / Carol Pillsbury vs Rebecca Kay / Ashley Edmonds0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Becky Reiss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Dolores Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Debbie Hellmann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Jane Liles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Pillsbury
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Dee Hopfenspirger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mary Benin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Jane Kiefer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sally van Oosbree
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Theresa Quinlan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Yvonne Merrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvonne Merrick + Mary Benin033 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Quinlan + Sally van Oosbree123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Reiss
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Dolores Schmidt
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Debbie Hellmann
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Jane Liles
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Carol Pillsbury
0W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dee Hopfenspirger
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Benin
3W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jane Kiefer
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally van Oosbree
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Quinlan
10W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvonne Merrick
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.