Teams

Kirk - SHL

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-23vs Trawick - RS ClaySplit 22
L#1 DoublesTeresa Kirk / Christina Amjad vs Katie Cooper-Bussell / Alicia Trawick1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKim Murawski vs Rhonda Springer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDenny Rarrick / Liz Edlund vs Susan Davis / Robin Hoffman6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTeresa Berg / Karen Crane vs Jen Swan / Monika Greene6-0, 6-4
2026-04-16vs Escambia/RossLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarcy Thompson / Melissa Caster vs Kaye Whittenberger / Kimberly Fortier3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeeAnn Ruffin vs Jeanna Dulyanai2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Etscheid / Lori Goto vs Tonya Chase / Trish Kington3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Berg / Karen Crane vs Kathy Ross / Malu Dunn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-09vs Sparks - RS HardWon 31
W#1 DoublesLiz Edlund / Melissa Caster vs Vanessa Vey / Jacqueline Pommerening6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKimberly Etscheid vs Michelle Washington4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeeAnn Ruffin / Lori Goto vs Gretchen Miller / Wendi Best6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngie Causey / Karen Crane vs Jennifer Bollinger / Jennifer Washington6-3, 6-3
2026-04-02vs Holmes - RS HardWon 40
W#1 DoublesKim Murawski / Angie Causey vs LAURY KOONTZ / Jennifer McCurdy7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTeresa Kirk vs Liliya Slutsker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Goto / Kimberly Etscheid vs Mary Pene / Kelli Filardi5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Berg / Christina Amjad vs Jessica Isakson / Natalie Nguyen6-0, 6-3
2026-03-26vs Trawick - RS ClayWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngie Causey / Denny Rarrick vs Alicia Trawick / Susan Davis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKim Murawski vs Katie Cooper-Bussell6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarcy Thompson / LeeAnn Ruffin vs Jen Swan / Monika Greene4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Amjad / Melissa Caster vs Carmen White / Lisa Streete7-5, 6-1
2026-03-19vs Wilson - RS HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Kirk / Liz Edlund vs Candy Zuleger / Jennifer Johnson6-3, 6-4
2026-03-12vs Escambia/RossLost 04
L#1 DoublesDenny Rarrick / LeeAnn Ruffin vs Kimberly Fortier / Judy Harrington2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTeresa Berg vs Natalia Burroughs6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Crane / Christina Amjad vs Carolyn Moore / Kadi Taylor1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Etscheid / Angie Causey vs Kathy Ross / Debra Neethling4-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs Sparks - RS HardWon 31
L#1 DoublesKim Murawski / Marcy Thompson vs Jacqueline Pommerening / Vanessa Vey7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeeAnn Ruffin vs Jill Sparks6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLiz Edlund / Christine Re vs Wendi Best / Michelle Washington6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Goto / Teresa Kirk vs Jennifer Bollinger / Sandra Ling6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Karen Crane
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Liz Edlund
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Marcy Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Lori Goto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Melissa Caster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Teresa Kirk
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Christine Re
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
LeeAnn Ruffin
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Angie Causey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Kim Murawski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.70
Denny Rarrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Kimberly Etscheid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Christina Amjad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Teresa Berg
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Mary Brann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcy Thompson + Melissa Caster224 matchesnot enough data
Denny Rarrick + Kimberly Etscheid123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Crane
19W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Liz Edlund
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Marcy Thompson
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Lori Goto
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Melissa Caster
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Teresa Kirk
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Christine Re
39W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
LeeAnn Ruffin
7W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Angie Causey
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Kim Murawski
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Denny Rarrick
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Kimberly Etscheid
4W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Christina Amjad
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Teresa Berg
17W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.59
Mary Brann
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.