← Teams

PT&E/SJRC-Newland/Kochis

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Lauren Skelly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Keith Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.86
Louie Amurao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Adina Talpos
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Gabriel Newland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Allison Fryman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Lia Irvin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Nolan Astrab
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-12-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Austin Cano vs Kari Hastings / Ben Talpos6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Kochis / Louie Amurao vs Danica Lee / Joshua Goddard7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Witty / Nolan Astrab vs Alyssa Mah / Huy Pham6-2, 7-5
2024-11-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLauren Skelly / Bradley Martin vs Amanda Jensen / Matthew Kanagandram7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdina Talpos / Keith Anderson vs Rachel Ritchie / Quang Pham6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Novak / Austin Cano vs Cate Harrington / Ezra James3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarina Rubinshteyn / Louie Amurao vs Constance Erickson / Vimal Natarajan6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Skelly / Bradley Martin vs Carla Wheeler / Srinivasa Kanamatha6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAllison Fryman / Colin Reingold vs Sydney Taggart / Saril Valiyaparambil6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-12Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Gabriel Newland vs Cheri Martes Davis / Roshen Warrier6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Witty / Keith Anderson vs Lisa Hockman / James Takahashi6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Fryman / Nolan Astrab vs Frank Shen / Jeri Finn4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-06Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesLauren Skelly / Nolan Astrab vs Hector M Salomon / Mary Hlady6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAdina Talpos / Keith Anderson vs Jon Monson / Christina Wright6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-29Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSarah Kochis / Gabriel Newland vs Whitney Palfreyman / Halbert Luong6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Skelly / Bradley Martin vs Nathan Austin / Tammy Cofield6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdina Talpos / Keith Anderson vs Vickie Maletteri / Tuan Truong6-1, 6-4
2024-09-29Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRachel Novak / Austin Cano vs Patrick Clancy / Samantha Williams6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Witty / Louie Amurao vs Shaoping Lin / Tina Clancy6-3, 7-5
2024-09-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLauren Skelly / Bradley Martin vs Nathan Austin / Tammy Cofield6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarina Rubinshteyn / Gabriel Newland vs Tuan Truong / Traci Harris6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Fryman / Nolan Astrab vs Halbert Luong / Elisa Landers6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Lauren Skelly
68W–37L career
0%99%1%
4.24
4
Keith Anderson
34W–27L career
0%94%5%
3.88
4
Louie Amurao
25W–19L career
0%97%3%
3.86
4
Adina Talpos
31W–29L career
not enough data
—
4
Gabriel Newland
32W–27L career
not enough data
—
4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
4
Allison Fryman
49W–24L career
3%97%1%
3.73
3.5
Lia Irvin
63W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Nolan Astrab
19W–5L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.