Teams

ROLLING HILLS 18AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-12vs TIBURON PEN C 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesBen Nelson / Christopher Hatch vs John Parsons / Jason Day6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-11vs MARIN TC 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesBen Nelson vs Nick Stiritz1-6, 4-6
2025-06-01vs NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesBen Nelson vs Gan Tam6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-30Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBen Nelson vs Huntly Gordon1-6, 4-6
2025-05-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBen Nelson vs Todd Hedrick2-6, 5-7
2025-05-04vs TIBURON PEN C 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesBen Nelson vs Hector Gutierrez3-6, 0-6
2025-04-19vs MILL VALLEY 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#2 SinglesBen Nelson vs Fred Mcferran3-6, 3-6
2025-04-13Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBen Nelson vs Edwin Tucker7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Aaron Walz
published 4
3.53
Erik Krogh-Jespersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Mark Britschgi
published
3.52
Patrick Rimbaud
published
3.46
Peter Halpern
published
3.46
Michael Almeraris
published
3.42
Christopher Hatch
published 3.5
3.39
Mike Schnebeck
published
3.31
Ben Nelson
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.31
Mark Latimer
published
3.28
Monte Zweben
published
3.28
Noah Dehlinger
published
3.24
Ryan Janos
published
3.19
Curtis Crawford
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Walz
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Erik Krogh-Jespersen
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Mark Britschgi
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Patrick Rimbaud
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Peter Halpern
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Michael Almeraris
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Christopher Hatch
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Mike Schnebeck
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ben Nelson
27W–40L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Mark Latimer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Monte Zweben
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Noah Dehlinger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Ryan Janos
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Curtis Crawford
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.