Teams

TRI-PLE THREAT

2022 VA Beach Tri-Level 18 & Over · VA Beach Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-17vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Cowen / Betty Domanski vs Katie Donahue / Heather Truman6-1, 6-1
2022-11-10vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Erin Camden vs Kelly Austin / Jenna DeLigio6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBetty Domanski / Christine Cowen vs Heather Truman / Karlyn Gendreau6-1, 6-1
2022-11-03vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetty Domanski / Christine Cowen vs Heather Truman / Karlyn Gendreau6-0, 6-1
2022-11-03vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetty Domanski / Christine Cowen vs Kelly Austin / Michele Moyer6-1, 6-0
2022-10-27vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Christine Cowen vs Georgia Carr / Amy Ricciardella2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-20vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Lori Cox vs Julie Kuhle / Michele Moyer6-0, 6-1
2022-10-06vs SOUTH BEACH RACQUETSWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Cox / Betty Domanski vs Kelly Austin / Julie Kuhle6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for VA Beach Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Betty Domanski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.37
Paige Caporicci
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Beth Kulas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Christine Cowen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Janet Brashear
published
2.92
Kimberly Cummings
published
2.75
Faye Downey
published 3
Helen Miller
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Camden + Christine Cowen6058% gamesnot enough data
Betty Domanski + Christine Cowen5086% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Cummings + Faye Downey3254% gamesnot enough data
Paige Caporicci + Christine Cowen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Betty Domanski
102W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Paige Caporicci
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christine Cowen
107W–97L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Janet Brashear
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Kimberly Cummings
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Faye Downey
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Helen Miller
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.