Teams

Girls Just Wanna Have Fun

2024 Washington D.C. Combo · Washington D.C. Combo 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-02vs DC Tennis ClubWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Hayman / Alexis Feringa vs Suzanne Krudys / Erika Hoppes0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Lynn Shanahan / Silvia Dacci vs Katherine Dodson / Jennifer Serfass6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Payne / Veronica Hamilton vs Angela Sharma / Li Ives6-4, 4-3
2024-10-13vs NETworkWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Lynn Shanahan / Silvia Dacci vs Chamaya Hutchens / Sara Tobin5-7, 4-3
2024-09-28vs Anderson & AndersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSaira Malik / Margaret Cornelius vs Giselle Medina / JENNIFER JOY3-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesSilvia Dacci / Veronica Hamilton vs Tina Woods / Elaine Johnson6-7, 1-4
2024-09-22vs PINEY RUN AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Silvia Dacci vs Karen Francis / Socheata Kim5-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesMary Lynn Shanahan / Kimberly Hayman vs Kris Morris / Wendy Harman2-6, 2-6
2024-09-15vs C'MON!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSilvia Dacci / Mary Lynn Shanahan vs Amber Surmiller / Meghan Smith0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPalmer Dorn / Sarah Payne vs Nicole Brizan / Lorena Alfaro6-7, 1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Washington D.C. Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PINEY RUN Slicers0681022169
2Girls Just Wanna Have Fun0751632204
3Lady Noon Ballers0816815154
4C'MON!0817718165
5All Aces0815920168
6PINEY RUN Aces08111324205
7NETwork08111325196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Kimberly Hayman
published
Anne Christman
published 3.5
3.21
Alexis Feringa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Saira Malik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.79
Palmer Dorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Lynn Shanahan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sarah Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Silvia Dacci
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Lynn Shanahan + Silvia Dacci213 matchesnot enough data
Palmer Dorn + Saira Malik303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Hayman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Anne Christman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Alexis Feringa
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Saira Malik
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
Palmer Dorn
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Mary Lynn Shanahan
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Payne
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Silvia Dacci
18W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.