Teams

HFTC - Rally Cats

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 3.5 Ladies Singles

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-09vs Lost Forest - The AlphaWon 31
W#1 SinglesAlyssa Min vs Victoria Leyva6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCassidy Goode vs Mimi Chan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesTia Nicole vs Jiali Yang6-4, 6-4
W#4 SinglesYin Yiu vs Jacinda Woloson6-4, 6-3
2025-03-19vs Lost Forest - The AlphaLost 13
L#1 SinglesCathie Partridge vs Angela Dains6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBetty Chan vs Victoria Leyva0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesYin Yiu vs Jiali Yang3-6, 2-6
W#4 SinglesTia Nicole vs Kinjal Parikh6-4, 6-2
2025-02-26vs LLTC - Smash Hit SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesYin Yiu vs Jessica Lin3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKarina Vela vs An Phan0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesTia Nicole vs Yuxi Meng6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCathie Partridge vs Cindy Trevino6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBetty Chan vs Laura Brickey0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesCassidy Goode vs Michele Frey6-1, 6-3
W#4 SinglesHallee Wirtshafter vs Rekha Narahari6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Tia Nicole
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #4 Singles 33% · published
3.29
Cassidy Goode
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Gale Johnson
published
Alyssa Min
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Hallee Wirtshafter
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Cathie Partridge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Yin Yiu
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #4 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Mary Margaret McCormick
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 50% · published
2.88
Betty Chan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Karina Vela
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathie Partridge + Betty Chan3255% games+13.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tia Nicole
47W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
3.5
Cassidy Goode
5W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Gale Johnson
25W–34L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alyssa Min
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hallee Wirtshafter
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cathie Partridge
32W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Yin Yiu
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Mary Margaret McCormick
21W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Betty Chan
20W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Karina Vela
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.