Teams

Cooper/Memphis

2026 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-29vs Hollis/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesTyler Darby / Lesley Grubbs vs Debbie Walker-Hulette / Mark Gagliano7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStephanie Longsworth / David Kam vs Paul Woods / Andrea Henry6-2, 6-4
2026-07-15vs Hollis/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Seay / Daniel Davis vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Daniel Forbes0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Magee / David Kam vs Debbie Walker-Hulette / Mark Gagliano2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Longsworth / Tyler Darby vs Bill Whitmire / Anna Whitmire6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-13vs Schneiderman/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesXuezhong Li / Lesley Grubbs vs Nancy Goodwin / William Stine6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBin Li / Catie Carter vs Virginia Palacio / Gregg Beeber6-4, 6-3
2026-07-01vs Hollis/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesTyler Darby / Catie Carter vs Stacey Hyde / Daniel Forbes6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Longsworth / David Kam vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Alvin Abston7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLesley Grubbs / Daniel Davis vs Carmen Lewis / Jerry Vaughn3-6, 3-6
2026-06-24vs Schneiderman/MemphisSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Longsworth / Xuezhong Li vs Christine Woods / Vidyasagar Velamala6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Carstensen / David Kam vs Kristy Pelt / RAYUDU KUMPATLA6-0, 6-1
2026-06-24vs Schneiderman/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Kam / Stephanie Longsworth vs Melony Bratton / Chad Alford6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTyler Darby / Marla Goodwin vs Jo Picha / Gregg Beeber6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hollis/Memphis5114411113
2Cooper/Memphis3311716149
3Schneiderman/Memphis1521634207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Tyler Darby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Stephanie Longsworth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.88
Xuezhong Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
David Kam
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Catie Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Lesley Grubbs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Shannon Seay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Marla Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
ROBERT LEBLANC
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kevin Roedel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jennifer Carstensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Eric Hasseltine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Seay + Xuezhong Li2450% gamesnot enough data
David Kam + Stephanie Longsworth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Darby
20W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
Stephanie Longsworth
21W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Xuezhong Li
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
David Kam
17W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Catie Carter
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Lesley Grubbs
51W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Shannon Seay
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Marla Goodwin
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kevin Roedel
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jennifer Carstensen
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Eric Hasseltine
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.