Teams

Farmington - Watson - 4.5 Men

2026 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs BHSC - Raffinan - WarhogsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Johnston / Andrew Watson vs Wescott Blemker / Mark Raffinan6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCarlos Romero Pou vs Robert Cueva4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJonah Oxman vs John McNeil0-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs ACAC - Profitt/FendleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJonathan Pugh / Stuart Chase vs JOSEPH MATHERS / Mark Critchfield6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTrevor Chase vs Ruoyu Zhang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Jennings / Christian Pouncey vs Chris Hapgood / Harris Haynie2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-04vs BHSC - Raffinan - WarhogsLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobert Johnston / Christian Pouncey vs Reid Phillips / Raymond Moreland3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Pugh vs Todd Sechser7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichards Miller / Rushman Andrews vs Justin Mutter / Brandon Schartz4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew McClellan / Andrew Watson vs Robert Cueva / Jay Reeves3-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs ACAC - Profitt/FendleyLost 13
L#1 DoublesStuart Chase / Jonathan Pugh vs Chris Hapgood / Harris Haynie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarlos Romero Pou vs Ruoyu Zhang6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoe Jennings / Rushman Andrews vs Mark Critchfield / Mark Illgner5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesTrevor Chase vs Aaron Streit2-6, 0-6
2026-04-14vs BHSC - Raffinan - WarhogsLost 23
W#1 DoublesJonathan Pugh / Stuart Chase vs Jay Bolus / Robert Cueva6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarlos Romero Pou vs Todd Sechser6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoe Jennings / Christian Pouncey vs Raymond Moreland / Justin Mutter2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJonah Oxman vs Andrew Juge1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew McClellan / Andrew Watson vs Thomas Weck / Alex Wermeling3-6, 1-6
2026-04-06vs ACAC - Profitt/FendleyLost 23
W#1 DoublesJoe Jennings / Jonathan Pugh vs Chris Hapgood / Harris Haynie6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarlos Romero Pou vs Ruoyu Zhang6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristian Pouncey / Stuart Chase vs Robert Johnston / Mark Illgner3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDaniel Carlson vs Ramzi Talhouk6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark McCarron / Rushman Andrews vs Mark Critchfield / JOSEPH MATHERS7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BHSC - Raffinan - Warhogs61241132279
2ACAC - Profitt/Fendley34152046326
3Farmington - Watson - 4.5 Men15111942296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Jonathan Pugh
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.35
Carlos Romero Pou
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Joe Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Daniel Carlson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Matthew McClellan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Stuart Chase
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.98
Mark McCarron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Rushman Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.91
Richards Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Christian Pouncey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Andrew Watson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.63
Jonah Oxman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Sean Mullins
published
Trevor Chase
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Pugh + Stuart Chase213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Pugh
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Carlos Romero Pou
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
Joe Jennings
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Daniel Carlson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Matthew McClellan
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Stuart Chase
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Mark McCarron
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.98
Rushman Andrews
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Richards Miller
36W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
Christian Pouncey
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.76
4
Andrew Watson
6W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Jonah Oxman
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Sean Mullins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Trevor Chase
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.