Teams

SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Enwright

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-14vs SD 3.0 PTC/ Nguyen- BosworthLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Sonbaty / Michelle Scott vs Reilly Bosworth / Angelie Hoang3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKate Paradis vs Amy Wang0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Goetting / Danielle Stroud vs Emily Griffith / Grace An4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Scott / Jessica Bunster vs Amy Rorstad / Molly Sterner2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Bargeman vs Candace Gyure1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Enwright / Natalie Grant vs Cathy Edwards / Malinda Marsh5-7, 3-6
2026-06-02vs SD 3.0 PLNU (2:30PM)/ HagstromWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Goetting / Kate Paradis vs Andrea Evans / Elayne Berman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHolly Amaya vs Hadley Lugash6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Bunster / Miriam Mceachern vs Karen Axmann / Wendy Collins6-4, 6-3
2026-05-31vs SD 3.0 Mtn View/ LimonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Bargeman / Sarah Enwright vs Edith Limon / Karen Shibuya3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMiriam Mceachern vs Noor Hilmi6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanielle Stroud / Holly Amaya vs Stacy Tomita / Keiko Small2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMay Salyards / Maria Bargeman vs Jill McAllaster / Emily Voeller6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHolly Doane vs Kara Henderson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Enwright / Natalie Grant vs Carrie Ridge / Melissa MacK1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-03vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerLost 12
W#1 DoublesMay Salyards / Maria Bargeman vs Sheryl Putnam / Margaret Amaral6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHolly Doane vs Jennifer Austin4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Goetting / Michelle Scott vs Nancy Swirhun / Anna Thomas5-7, 5-7
2026-04-18vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ OlivaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Sonbaty / May Salyards vs Kathryn Parisi / Micaela Banach2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMiriam Mceachern vs Natalie Vaca4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Bunster / Natalie Grant vs Ashley Ragsdale / Corrine Lott6-4, 6-4
2026-04-12vs SD WE LLW 3.0 La Jolla TC/ CovelloLost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Amaya / Jessica Goetting vs Lulu Ren / Ladan Monshi2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMiriam Mceachern vs Laurie Lopez6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanielle Stroud / Kate Paradis vs Demet Bucher / Angela Landen4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · SD- Women- WE 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD WE LLW 3.0 La Jolla TC/ Covello7117716173
2SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Oliva6215924202
3SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Kleiner5317715174
4SD 3.0 Balboa Sunday Smashers/ Guyre44131124202
5SD 3.0 PTC/ Nguyen- Bosworth35101431228
6SD 3.0 PLNU (2:30PM)/ Hagstrom3591533237
7SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Enwright3591533240
8SD 3.0 Mtn View/ Limon3581635251
9SD 3.0 Sets in the City @BTC/ La Crue26101432229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
May Salyards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Maria Bargeman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Miriam Mceachern
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.73
Jessica Bunster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Jessica Goetting
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Jessica Sonbaty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Natalie Grant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kate Paradis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.48
Sarah Enwright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Holly Amaya
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Danielle Stroud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Holly Doane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Stroud + Kate Paradis224 matchesnot enough data
Miriam Mceachern + Jessica Bunster404 matchesnot enough data
May Salyards + Maria Bargeman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
May Salyards
23W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Maria Bargeman
3W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
2.5
Miriam Mceachern
41W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.74
Jessica Bunster
13W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
3
Jessica Goetting
26W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Jessica Sonbaty
17W–28L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Natalie Grant
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
Kate Paradis
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Sarah Enwright
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Holly Amaya
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Danielle Stroud
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Holly Doane
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.