← Teams

CHARB-Moreno

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 3.58 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.31
Lisa Wisthoff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Karen Groenweghe
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
—
Kathi Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Patricia Sturr
published 3.5
3.04
Christine Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-03-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Tony Moreno vs Autumn Bunch / Albert Hensley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Wisthoff / RICK ROGOWAY vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Sam Lumetta6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathi Gray / Catalin Stoica vs Cricket Forsey / Brad Johnson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKathi Gray / Shirish Patel vs Lei Zhu / Paritosh Saxena6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Wisthoff / RICK ROGOWAY vs Helen Chen / Sheldon Sun7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / David Lee vs Jian Xu / Shawn Boyce6-3, 6-2
2022-03-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKathi Gray / RICK ROGOWAY vs Janine Wood / Martin Jeffrey Binns6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Jeffrey Taylor vs Jennifer Woodard / Rick Davis7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristine Taylor / Tony Moreno vs Kari Hastings / Bob Lehman6-4, 6-2
2022-02-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTony Moreno / Christine Taylor vs Tony Mattos / Dayna Porter7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / David Lee vs Sundar Ramamurthy / Suki Birge7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Taylor / Lisa Wisthoff vs Dean Waters / Susan Rolfe6-4, 7-5
2022-02-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLisa Wisthoff / Jeffrey Taylor vs Dan Bingham / Nichole Anglin6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Taylor / Tony Moreno vs Julie Trujillo / David Swanson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / RICK ROGOWAY vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Tony Moreno vs Sibyl Jarrett / Dan Wolff6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / RICK ROGOWAY vs Lori Zoborowski / Rand Zoborowski6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathi Gray / Catalin Stoica vs Rita DeWeese / Seth Yount6-0, 6-2
2022-01-28Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKathi Gray / Shirish Patel vs Kim Wright / Jeffrey Bayless6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Jeffrey Taylor vs Brooke Daniel / Fenn Bourland6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristine Taylor / Tony Moreno vs Rachel Young / Reza Kafi6-0, 6-1
2022-01-15Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Jeffrey Taylor vs Diane Hardman / Dave Hardman6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Taylor / Tony Moreno vs Lauren Smith / Patrick Kirk6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathi Gray / Catalin Stoica vs JANE LENG / Richard Jennings7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tony Moreno
309W–153L career
2%98%0%
3.68
3.5
Lisa Wisthoff
34W–29L career
3%90%7%
3.31
3.5
Karen Groenweghe
82W–81L career
0%98%1%
3.31
3.5
Kathi Gray
28W–50L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Patricia Sturr
59W–77L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Christine Taylor
47W–49L career · type A
24%76%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.