Teams

Young Intrepids

2025 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-08vs I'd Hit That 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGerald McClellan / Gregory Whitmyer vs Scott Miller / Eric Putman4-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs Sultans of SwingLost 01
L#1 DoublesGregory Whitmyer / Gerald McClellan vs Michael Zehr / Xavier Ona6-7, 4-6
2025-02-21vs Just for FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesGerald McClellan / Gregory Whitmyer vs Kameron Hnath / Hanlun Song6-2, 6-3
2025-02-06vs Smiles and Laughs 7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesIvan Teelucksingh / Gregory Whitmyer vs Renhuan Xu / Eric Zhou7-6, 6-3
2025-01-22vs Sultans of SwingLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Santos / Stephen Rawlings vs J Nathan / David Warren0-6, 3-6
2025-01-15vs Just for FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesIgor Chechik / Taft Irons vs Ryan Choi / Mark Tyler2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHarvey Kellman / Ivan Teelucksingh vs Dave Kim / Eddie Gao6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-08vs I'd Hit That 7.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Johnson / Gregory Whitmyer vs Johnny Hsiung / Larry Wall4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Santos / Stephen Rawlings vs Jim Leveque / James Smith4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Brendon Smith
published 4
3.70
Adam Coyle
published 4
3.56
Gregory Whitmyer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.35
Igor Chechik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Jeffrey Santos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Gerald McClellan
published
3.08
Volker Englisch
published
3.03
Michael Kessler
published
2.88
Stephen Rawlings
published
Harvey Kellman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ivan Teelucksingh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Taft Irons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendon Smith
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
4.11
4
Adam Coyle
5W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Gregory Whitmyer
25W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Igor Chechik
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Jeffrey Santos
124W–218L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Gerald McClellan
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Volker Englisch
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Michael Kessler
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Stephen Rawlings
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Harvey Kellman
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Taft Irons
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.