Teams

Spanish Fork-Mayberry/Blackhurst

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W AM

17 players · average NTRP 4.15 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-07Split 11
L#2 DoublesKaty Alder / Kristen Siddoway vs Laura Bailey / Julie Winterton1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesChristy Davidson vs Gretchen Knell2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Siddoway / Katy Alder vs Pam Ollivier / Cathy Davis2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-17Split 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Bott / Jessica Olsen vs Cristie Briggs / Jennifer Watts6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNatalie Lindquist / Kristen Siddoway vs Susan Koelliker / Tiffany Kasteler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-10vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-UtgaardLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Siddoway / Katy Alder vs Renee Utgaard / Catherine Bliss4-6, 4-6
2021-05-03vs Ivory Ridge-HydeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Siddoway / Natalie Lindquist vs Kristi Reeves / Katy Myers6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChristy Davidson vs Tracy Derby3-6, 4-6
2021-04-26vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Kemp/ParkerLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Bott / Jessica Olsen vs Emily Wallace / Nanette Heath5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChristy Davidson vs Cyndi Jones1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Siddoway / Angela Kelson vs Nichole Young / Heather Paddock4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-19Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Lindquist / Kristen Siddoway vs Laura Bailey / Julie Winterton1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Bott / Jessica Olsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesChristy Davidson vs Meghan Clark4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKaty Alder / Natalie Lindquist vs Lisa Sterbenz / Heidi Gennerman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Olsen / Emily Bott vs Heather Bernard / Michele Halls6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CMTA @ Liberty Park-Miller71261434328
2CMTA @ Liberty Park-Kemp/Parker35162455383
3Spanish Fork-Mayberry/Blackhurst26192149363
4CMTA @ Liberty Park-Bernard/Sterbenz08103066441

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Emily Bott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Kaori Allen
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Christy Davidson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.86
Tyra Cook
published 4
3.78
Lisa Mayberry
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Angela Kelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Katy Alder
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.54
Jessica Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Kristen Siddoway
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Megan Austin
published
Nancy Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Natalie Lindquist
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tami Austin
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Davidson + Nancy Kirk4174% games+21.5% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kaori Allen11167% games+11.9% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry3360% games+8.0% vs expected
Jessica Olsen + Emily Bott272451% games+2.8% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Tena Maughan19960% games+1.8% vs expected
Tyra Cook + Christy Davidson6453% games+0.3% vs expected
Kaori Allen + Nancy Kirk8165% games−1.5% vs expected
Natalie Lindquist + Kristen Siddoway6649% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Bott
50W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Kaori Allen
119W–45L career · 9 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Christy Davidson
42W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Belinda Jensen
150W–92L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Tyra Cook
43W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86
Lisa Mayberry
80W–81L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Angela Kelson
18W–34L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 11 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 7 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jessica Olsen
72W–87L career · 10 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Halli Craft
62W–48L career · 2 lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 10 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
Kristen Siddoway
23W–36L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan Austin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Kirk
48W–20L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Lindquist
33W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tami Austin
37W–27L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.