Teams

KY/LOU/HOSTETLER

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 WOMEN

5 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-26vs KY/LOU/OCONNELL (NPC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesSara DeSanctis vs Regan Ackerman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Lauren Whitsell6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesErica Rust vs Mary Wallitsch6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-18vs KY/LOU/SCHREIBERWon 30
W#1 SinglesSara DeSanctis vs Karen Raby6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesErica Rust vs Rhonda Arnold6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Jennifer Ottman6-0, 6-0
2026-08-10vs KY/LOU/RECHTERLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Jennifer Goselin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Kane-Liu vs Sarah Keith6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesErica Rust vs Laura Morris4-6
2026-08-08vs KY/LOU/OCONNELL (NPC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesSara DeSanctis vs Natalie Kjellman3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Kane-Liu vs Lauren Whitsell7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHannah Hostetler vs Meagan Claypool6-2, 6-1
2026-07-30vs KY/LOU/RECHTERWon 21
L#1 SinglesErica Rust vs Jennifer Goselin2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHannah Hostetler vs Sarah Keith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Rebekkah Rechter6-1, 6-3
2026-07-29vs KY/LOU/SCHREIBERWon 21
W#1 SinglesHannah Hostetler vs Carmen Schreiber6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Karen Raby6-1, 7-6
L#3 SinglesErica Rust vs Rhonda Arnold2-6, 4-6
2026-07-13vs KY/LOU/OCONNELL (NPC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesSara DeSanctis vs Alisha Kull6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHannah Hostetler vs Cara Robinson6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesSarah Kane-Liu vs Regan Ackerman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs KY/LOU/SCHREIBERWon 30
W#1 SinglesSara DeSanctis vs Karen Raby7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Rose Shuck6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHannah Hostetler vs Rhonda Arnold6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Sara DeSanctis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Hannah Hostetler
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.95
Sarah Kane-Liu
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.91
Mary Grace Amato
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.87
Erica Rust
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara DeSanctis
21W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Hannah Hostetler
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Sarah Kane-Liu
44W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Mary Grace Amato
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Erica Rust
13W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.