Teams

LCTA40/Howle/MPR

2022 USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles-LCTA · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Barnes Dix
published 4.5
Ashley Ravenel
published 4
3.69
3.24
Steven Howle
published
2.86
Denyse Barkley
published 3
2.80
David Rembert
published 3
2.79
Kyle Murrell
published
Chris Ravenel
published 3
2.73
Edward Oswald
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barnes Dix
29W–36L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Ashley Ravenel
48W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Charlie Inglefield
52W–23L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Steven Howle
34W–44L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Denyse Barkley
42W–86L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
David Rembert
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Kyle Murrell
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Chris Ravenel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Edward Oswald
19W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.