Teams

NE/Berlin-Paap/65&Over7.0W

2025 Neb. Adult 65&Over · 7.0 Adult Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-23vs Bigando/MueretWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Berlin / Jacquie Dierks vs Cindy Bluml / Karen Crook6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCathie Turner / Mary Longo vs Sally Johnson / Debra Bigando6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVirginia Paap / Mary Nordstrand vs Anne Conlon / Cheryl Schmidt6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-16vs Bigando/MueretWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Spomer / Yasuko Wakuzawa vs Cheryl Schmidt / Anne Conlon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Paap / Michelle Berlin vs Cindy Bluml / Diane Byrnes6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Nordstrand / Ann Galley vs Nancy Watson / Debra Bigando6-1, 6-4
2025-05-14vs Bigando/MueretWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathie Turner / Yasuko Wakuzawa vs Diane Byrnes / Cindy Bluml3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Berlin / Barbara Spomer vs Anne Conlon / Nancy Watson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlene Liesveld / Ann Galley vs Karen Crook / Cheryl Schmidt6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Berlin-Paap/65&Over7.0W3081674
2Bigando/Mueret031816100

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Charlene Liesveld
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ann Galley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jacquie Dierks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Cathie Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Barbara Spomer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mary Longo
published
Mary Nordstrand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Berlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Paap
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Yasuko Wakuzawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Paap + Michelle Berlin11360% gamesnot enough data
Yasuko Wakuzawa + Barbara Spomer5748% gamesnot enough data
Yasuko Wakuzawa + Cathie Turner7070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charlene Liesveld
33W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Ann Galley
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacquie Dierks
42W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Cathie Turner
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3.5
Barbara Spomer
22W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Mary Longo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Nordstrand
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Berlin
22W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Paap
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yasuko Wakuzawa
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.