Teams

The Plantation - Haines

2022 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-22vs Eagle Harbor - TownsendLost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Brianne Toole vs Tracey Hess / Greta Pacilio4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Elizabeth Marino vs Tameka Bezue-Jackson / Kimberly Schoof4-6, 2-6
2022-05-26vs Duval/Latta-Raines (Clulb Cont)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Mindy Ezring vs Donna Marceau / Jennelle Comiskey5-7, 1-6
2022-05-24vs Eagle Harbor - TownsendLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Kelly Davis vs Kandee Townsend / Jolene Hamel6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-17vs Eagle Landing - NewmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Mindy Ezring vs Ruth Jones-Looney / Jennifer Osbeck3-6, 0-6
2022-05-05vs Pace Island - PinhoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Brianne Toole vs Lani Baruch / Khanna Gibson7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Louise Jack vs Kathleen Pinho / Melissa Ebener5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Duval/Latta-Raines (Clulb Cont)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCynthia Haines / Mindy Ezring vs Claudia Grosskruger / Sherri Ouchi7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Sheila Walker vs Donna Marceau / Jennelle Comiskey2-6, 1-6
2022-04-14vs Eagle Landing - NewmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Balsimo / Louise Jack vs Michelle Reid / Maria Tamming7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Davis / Cynthia Haines vs Sue Newman / Eden Payton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Cynthia Haines
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Brianne Toole
published 3.5
3.58
Amy Balsimo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.19
Mindy Ezring
published
2.87
Marissa Alex
published
2.83
Marnie Giancola
published
Louise Jack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brianne Toole + Cynthia Haines4165% games+4.9% vs expected
Cynthia Haines + Amy Balsimo404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Haines
127W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
3.5
Brianne Toole
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
4
Amy Balsimo
28W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mindy Ezring
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Marissa Alex
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
2.87
Marnie Giancola
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Louise Jack
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.