Teams

Flynt/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.0 18 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
University Club Of Memphis
Sep 19 3:00 PM
University Club Of Memphis
2026-09-01vs Franks/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrancesca Bengert / Colleen Wilson vs Estelle Mitchell / Jenni Harris3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDana Daly / Susan Deloach vs Suzanne Franks / Katy Kitchens2-6, 2-6
2026-08-22vs Blanton/MemphisLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Daly / Susan Deloach vs Amelia Blanton / Greer Moyes6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-08-15vs Cleveland/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Finerson / Casey Gleysteen vs Connie Clarkson / Peyton Corbin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFrancesca Bengert / Allison King vs Anna Claire Parker / Madison Cleveland7-6, 7-6
2026-08-08vs Franks/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Allison Becksfort / Francis Mcrae vs Jenni Harris / Katy Kitchens6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLibby Flynt / Kate Sullivan vs Estelle Mitchell / Claire Murk6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDana Daly / Angela Finerson vs Danielle Bartlett / Rachel Spangler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Francis Mcrae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Tanner Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Francesca Bengert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Angela Finerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Casey Gleysteen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Jennie Silk
published
2.05
Libby Flynt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Dana Daly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francis Mcrae + Francesca Bengert3256% games+7.4% vs expected
Dana Daly + Libby Flynt2838% games+1.4% vs expected
Dana Daly + Francis Mcrae0533% games−2.8% vs expected
Francis Mcrae + Libby Flynt1434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Francis Mcrae
22W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Tanner Baker
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Francesca Bengert
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Angela Finerson
16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Casey Gleysteen
13W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.17
Jennie Silk
6W–21L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Libby Flynt
18W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Dana Daly
7W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.