Teams

LTA BLUE

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-09vs RCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Stone / Kristin Parsons vs Karen Boisnard / Nancy Beaton3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGloria Andrews vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKris Graham / Sally Meier vs Tonya Johnson / Barbara Sands2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-02vs LTA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Stone / Tanya Eisele vs Anita Taylor / Adele Reester4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGloria Andrews vs Olimpia Mejia0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Arndt / Kris Graham vs Linda Ducay / Justine Barone7-5, 7-6
2022-03-26vs LTA REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Arndt / Kris Graham vs Julie Obrien / Lori Preston6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSally Meier vs Jenna Osborne0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Parsons / Tanya Eisele vs Jodie Morgan / Tracy King6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-03-19vs RCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Arndt / Kris Graham vs Jill Keogh / Karen Boisnard6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristin Parsons vs Amelia Taljaard6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTanya Eisele / Gloria Andrews vs Melissa Ronacher / Torey Kirkpatrick6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Kris Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Stephanie Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Gloria Andrews
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kristin Parsons
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Sally Meier
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Tanya Eisele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Meier + Kris Graham6652% games+7.5% vs expected
Kris Graham + Gloria Andrews5258% games+6.2% vs expected
Gloria Andrews + Kristin Parsons241953% games+5.4% vs expected
Tanya Eisele + Stephanie Stone251953% games+4.7% vs expected
Sally Meier + Jennifer Arndt5551% games+4.0% vs expected
Kris Graham + Stephanie Stone3457% games+3.5% vs expected
Kris Graham + Kristin Parsons101052% games+3.1% vs expected
Kris Graham + Jennifer Arndt322254% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kris Graham
131W–121L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Stephanie Stone
74W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gloria Andrews
105W–128L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Jennifer Arndt
134W–128L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Kristin Parsons
105W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Sally Meier
58W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Tanya Eisele
52W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.