Teams

MILL VALLEY 40MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

32 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 27 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Meg Shackleton
published
4.06
Kimberly Boswell
published
3.97
Brian Kneafsey
published 4.5
3.94
Kevin Knowles
published
3.81
Roark Vandien
published
3.81
Bill Graham
published 4
3.80
3.77
Erin McMahon
published
3.74
Vanessa Lyons
published
3.73
Lynn Graham
published
3.72
3.70
Catherine Stern
published 4
3.70
Penelope Luce
published
3.70
Nick Bockh
published
3.68
Rachel Aspatore
published
3.65
Aaron Klink
published 4
3.65
Chris Oconnor
published 4
3.60
Scott Dalton
published
3.57
Israel Rosales
published
3.54
Joe Boswell
published
3.51
Tina Jennings
published
3.48
Daisy Crosswell
published 4
3.38
Lisa Kift
published
3.27
Gina Seaborg
published
3.25
Mary McLain
published
Ben Crosswell
published 3.5
3.24
Libby Mitchell
published
3.16
Kathleen Craven
published
Gillian Reilly
published
Lane Shackleton
published
Lisa Schuller
published
Lucas Hatch
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Shackleton
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Kimberly Boswell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Brian Kneafsey
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Kevin Knowles
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Roark Vandien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Bill Graham
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Catherine Fogelman
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Erin McMahon
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Vanessa Lyons
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Lynn Graham
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Caitlin Landesberg
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Catherine Stern
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Penelope Luce
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Nick Bockh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Rachel Aspatore
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Aaron Klink
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Chris Oconnor
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Scott Dalton
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Israel Rosales
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Joe Boswell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Tina Jennings
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Daisy Crosswell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lisa Kift
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Gina Seaborg
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Mary McLain
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ben Crosswell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Libby Mitchell
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Kathleen Craven
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Gillian Reilly
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lane Shackleton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Schuller
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucas Hatch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.