Teams

55 & Over W8.0 - Dorado Jennifer Bates

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs 55 & Over W8.0 - Charo PerezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMadeline Perez / Rose Sanchez vs Victoria Perez / Milagros Martir0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bates / Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves vs Maria Rivera / Carmen Espada5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRose Sanchez / Madeline Perez vs Mari Carmen Bosch / Maria Esther Calvo1-6, 3-6
2022-03-04Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bates / Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves vs Ilia Colom / Maria Flores5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMadeline Perez / Rose Sanchez vs Janet Burgos / Elizabeth Ocasio0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-02-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMadeline Perez / Jennifer Bates vs Ilia Colom / Maria Flores6-4, 6-3
2022-02-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeline Perez / Yamira Rivera vs Sonia Lantigua-Garcia / Johanna Padro0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bates / Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves vs Beverly Santos / Emilia Abislaiman0-6, 1-6
2022-01-22vs 55 & Over W8.0 - Charo PerezSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAna Andino Arellano / Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves vs Irma Nevarez / Rosario Perez6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMadeline Perez / Rose Sanchez vs Maria Rivera / Carmen Espada2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLourdes Feliciano-Nieves / Jennifer Bates vs Lillian Nieves / Gloria Colon4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Yamira Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.30
Jennifer Bates
published
3.26
Rose Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Esperanza Cepeda
published 3.5
3.20
Wilma Colon
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.08
Ana Andino Arellano
published 3.5
Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Madeline Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sonia Hormaza
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Sanchez + Madeline Perez3842% gamesnot enough data
Yamira Rivera + Esperanza Cepeda5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Yamira Rivera
146W–76L career · type A · 11 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Jennifer Bates
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
Rose Sanchez
44W–65L career · 14 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Esperanza Cepeda
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wilma Colon
105W–80L career · 15 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ana Andino Arellano
14W–26L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Madeline Perez
17W–27L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonia Hormaza
31W–41L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.