Teams

Swedenburg 40+ Mixed - Columbus - MTC

2024 Mixed 40 & Over-EC · 4.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-25vs Magnolia Busby/RileyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Prestridge / David Howell vs Michael Busby / Debra Riley6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Cadenhead / Seong-Gon Kim vs Cherie Ivey / Carlos Flynn3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanice Reynolds / Phil McClellan vs Angela McCoy / Steve Swetz3-6, 4-6
2024-07-22vs Magnolia Busby/RileyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Cadenhead / Seong-Gon Kim vs Michael Busby / Angela McCoy6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Prestridge / Berk Huskison vs Bill Black / Susan McCarty7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJanice Reynolds / Phil McClellan vs Debra Riley / Carlos Flynn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-14vs Magnolia Busby/RileyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSeong-Gon Kim / Kim Prestridge vs Bill Black / Leah Ellis7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPhil McClellan / Karen Crosby vs Michael Busby / Cherie Ivey2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Swedenburg / Robert Chamblee vs Angela McCoy / Steve Swetz3-6, 5-7
2024-07-01vs Magnolia Busby/RileyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Swedenburg / David Howell vs Angela McCoy / Steve Swetz2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Cadenhead / Seong-Gon Kim vs Bill Black / Susan McCarty6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Reynolds / Berk Huskison vs Debra Riley / Carlos Flynn5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Swedenburg 40+ Mixed - Columbus - MTC318413128
2Magnolia Busby/Riley134817128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kim Cadenhead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Kim Prestridge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Seong-Gon Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Berk Huskison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Mary Swedenburg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Phil McClellan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Chamblee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Cadenhead + Seong-Gon Kim213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Cadenhead
41W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Kim Prestridge
43W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Seong-Gon Kim
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Berk Huskison
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Mary Swedenburg
33W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
Phil McClellan
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Chamblee
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.