Teams

ACOPI:Grip'nRip:Stern

2022 ME Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-04vs RFC:TBD:BowringLost 23
W#1 DoublesTheodore Faugno / Billy Noble vs Jerome Faure / Matthias Case6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSeth Hebert vs Xavier Claret Torrents2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesToru Matsubayashi / Hunter Morancy vs Chris Bowring / Patrick Casey6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesEvan Wells vs Harper Chalat2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRon Chillington / Travis Rogers vs Jonathan Swall / David Milliken1-6, 1-6
2022-06-04vs RFC:TBD:PickeringSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSeth Hebert / Hunter Morancy vs Thaddeus St John / Richard McLeod2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEvan Wells vs Adam Raudonat1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRon Chillington / Travis Rogers vs Mark Woodbury / Michael Samson7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesToru Matsubayashi vs Zach Caron6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs ETC:BigDogs:ToothakerLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichael Emmert / Billy Noble vs Alan Toothaker / David Szewczyk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEric Wu vs Evan Wigton-Jones5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEvan Wells / Hunter Morancy vs Benjamin Beverly / Noah Bracken1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesToru Matsubayashi vs David Peck3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTravis Rogers / Ron Chillington vs Bryan Lewis / August Lozano7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs RFC:TBD:BowringWon 32
L#1 DoublesBilly Noble / Theodore Faugno vs Joshua Graceffa / Joe Messerman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEric Wu vs Xavier Claret Torrents6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEvan Wells / Hunter Morancy vs John Scofield / Jonathan Swall5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Emmert vs Jerome Faure6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRon Chillington / Travis Rogers vs Steven Buxton / Scott Hardy6-3, 7-5
2022-05-14vs ETC:BigDogs:ToothakerLost 14
L#1 DoublesBilly Noble / Theodore Faugno vs Alan Toothaker / Andrew Myers7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSeth Hebert vs Benjamin Beverly6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Emmert / Alexander Stern vs August Lozano / Bryan Lewis1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEvan Wells vs Evan Wigton-Jones0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRon Chillington / Travis Rogers vs Noah Bracken / Daniel Granholm5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-14vs RFC:TBD:PickeringWon 31
W#1 DoublesBilly Noble / Theodore Faugno vs Richard Pickering / Richard McLeod7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Emmert / Alexander Stern vs Mark Woodbury / Michael Samson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEvan Wells vs Zach Caron6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRon Chillington / Travis Rogers vs Mike Federle / Philip Villiotte6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACOPI:Grip'nRip:Stern33151536290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Michael Emmert
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.90
Jose Afonso
published
3.82
Sean Maguire
published
Alexander Stern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Evan Wells
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Hunter Morancy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Billy Noble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Travis Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Ron Chillington
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Eric Wu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Seth Hebert
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Theodore Faugno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Toru Matsubayashi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wilbur Shardlow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Rogers + Ron Chillington14654% games−1.6% vs expected
Billy Noble + Theodore Faugno2550% games−2.7% vs expected
Hunter Morancy + Michael Emmert4257% gamesnot enough data
Hunter Morancy + Billy Noble224 matchesnot enough data
Billy Noble + Seth Hebert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Emmert
122W–62L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jose Afonso
29W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Sean Maguire
52W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Alexander Stern
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Evan Wells
5W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Hunter Morancy
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Billy Noble
25W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Travis Rogers
24W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Ron Chillington
17W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Eric Wu
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Seth Hebert
41W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Theodore Faugno
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Toru Matsubayashi
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wilbur Shardlow
37W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.