Teams

Hills - Tampa Palms/Vickers

2022 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-12vs Plant City - P. SmithWon 10
W#2 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Carol Guido / Patricia Smith6-3, 6-3
2022-02-05vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Tricia Cardoso vs Jane Feeney / Karen Montembeault5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-04vs Plant City - P. SmithSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarol Guidera / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Betty McIntosh / Julianna Holbrook6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy Sparks / Catherine Hoyord vs Patricia Smith / Jo Morton1-6, 2-6
2022-01-29vs Valencia Lakes - S. RobertsWon 20
W#2 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Catherine Hoyord vs Sharon Lucas / Gladys Rodriguez6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Guidera / Cindy Sparks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-15vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Tricia Cardoso vs Elizabeth Buck / Amalia Alaniz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Sparks / Karen Cleland vs Nancy Matuszak / Maria Barry4-6, 3-6
2022-01-08vs Valencia Lakes - S. RobertsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Cindy Sparks vs Helen DePinto / Katherine Santackas6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
2.86
Annmarie Iwanicki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Sherry Peterson
published
2.72
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.52
Karen Cleland
published
2.51
Catherine Hoyord
published 3
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Cardoso + Annmarie Iwanicki241153% games+2.5% vs expected
Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Annmarie Iwanicki
85W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Catherine Hoyord
4W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.