Teams

BCC

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-23vs MagginLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Rose / Cindee Smith vs Ann Kopsidas / Lisa Rudden0-6, 4-6
2024-02-08vs Racket PowerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJulia Latein-Kimmig / Cindee Smith vs Lucy Yun Yuan / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Kim Rehmann vs Mel Barrett / Pasimani Fryauff2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-02-05vs Manor 4.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesCindee Smith / Lisa Davison vs Sherri Dixon / Amy Burgoyne6-4, 6-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Vicki Herson vs Pamela Hjelle / Shannon Hockey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-01-11vs Smart Aces 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Audrey Yen vs Alixandria Lapp / Robin Birchfield3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kathryn L Boothe
published
Bridget Foist
published 4
3.68
Kathi Teitelbaum
published
3.59
Katharine Marino
published
3.56
Lisa Davison
published
3.54
Kim Rehmann
published
3.34
Cindee Smith
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.29
Monica Brenneman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Audrey Yen
published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Rose
published
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
published
2.97
Veronique Kessler
published
E Molly Hemsley
published
Jennifer Kress
published
Jill Lavin
published
Kay Han
published
Susie Barnello
published
Vicki Herson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn L Boothe
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Bridget Foist
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathi Teitelbaum
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Katharine Marino
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Lisa Davison
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kim Rehmann
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cindee Smith
49W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Monica Brenneman
46W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Audrey Yen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Rose
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Veronique Kessler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
E Molly Hemsley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Kress
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Lavin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kay Han
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susie Barnello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vicki Herson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.