Teams

MJones/EPease (Life Time)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-03vs NBrasch (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Clapham / Toni Escuder vs Maggie Webb / Ashley Hall4-6, 6-7
2022-09-26vs JGrahl (Mountainbrook)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Pease / Toni Escuder vs Kelly Blandford / Laura Clancy6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-15vs MBell (Charlotte Country Club)Won 10
W#2 DoublesHolly McClure / Toni Escuder vs Laura Judd / Mandi Bell6-4, 6-4
2022-09-12vs LSimmons (MPCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Campbell / Tiffany Kopittke vs Lindsay Gildea / Kellie Lecka4-6, 4-6
2022-08-29vs BBrown (Park Crossing)Won 20
W#1 DoublesErin Clapham / Raquel Correa vs Jocelyn Zuehlke / Rhonda Cantrell7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTiffany Kopittke / Elizabeth Campbell vs Mary Jo Schiefer / Cherie Bouchon6-4, 6-3
2022-08-22vs BLindley (Firethorne)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Pease / Toni Escuder vs Jamie Thomas / Patty Swan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Corine Danesis
published 4
3.69
Emily Pease
published 4
3.65
Hila Johnson
published 4
3.54
Holly McClure
published 4
3.41
Dana Holloman
published 3.5
3.34
Erin Clapham
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Toni Escuder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Kristy Simmons
published
3.16
Misty Jones
published
3.13
Tiffany Kopittke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Raquel Correa
published
Cory Mondshane
published
Priscilla Navarrete
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kopittke + Emily Pease6549% games−0.5% vs expected
Toni Escuder + Erin Clapham4166% gamesnot enough data
Tiffany Kopittke + Erin Clapham404 matchesnot enough data
Misty Jones + Emily Pease314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corine Danesis
34W–29L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Emily Pease
27W–16L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Hila Johnson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Holly McClure
25W–31L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Dana Holloman
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Erin Clapham
93W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Toni Escuder
66W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Kristy Simmons
22W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Misty Jones
27W–30L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Tiffany Kopittke
79W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Raquel Correa
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Cory Mondshane
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Priscilla Navarrete
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.