Teams

GR PINK

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs HRCA-N YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Petersen / Anna Landis vs Iryna Chekhovich-ott / Andrea Hagg6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Delabre vs Lauren Stone2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Childers / Emily Majcen vs Abbey Nieves / Margelly Beltran4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-22vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Tsaytak / Kate Fink vs Stephanie Auth / Adrian Schwarz1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChloe Conaway vs Suzanne Termaat0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Delabre / Anna Landis vs Kristine Johnson / LuAnn Wadman0-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs KC-RH BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesChloe Conaway / Emily Majcen vs Kendra Curry / Lisa Garcia6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKathy Tsaytak vs Christine Jacquet0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Childers / Amanda Petersen vs Natalie Hummell / Leslie Dennis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-05vs COV BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Majcen / Anna Landis vs Emily Goede / Michelle Wolfe7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Petersen vs Alex Anden6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Tsaytak / Kate Fink vs Amanda Breslin / Lisa Hoyer2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-29vs SS-LGT YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesChloe Conaway / Emily Majcen vs Andrea Pollack / Michelle Wiles7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStacey Childers vs Kristi Kloenne1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKathy Tsaytak / Anna Landis vs Natalie Chiappone / Heidi Green6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Anna Landis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Emily Majcen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Claudia Brazel
published 2.5
2.19
Amanda Petersen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.98
Chloe Conaway
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Kathy Tsaytak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.90
Kate Fink
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.76
Stacey Childers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.69
Nicole Delabre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Childers + Chloe Conaway224 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Childers + Emily Majcen314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Tsaytak + Nicole Delabre044 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Tsaytak + Emily Majcen044 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Delabre + Emily Majcen044 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Childers + Amanda Petersen033 matchesnot enough data
Chloe Conaway + Kathy Tsaytak033 matchesnot enough data
Chloe Conaway + Emily Majcen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Anna Landis
8W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Emily Majcen
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Claudia Brazel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Petersen
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Chloe Conaway
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Kathy Tsaytak
2W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Kate Fink
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Stacey Childers
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
Nicole Delabre
0W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.