Teams

Lighthouse Bay / Sotern

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesKathleen Hromyak / Kerry Roskopf vs Sarah Bergstrom / DEBORAH Eck6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesKerry Roskopf / Karen Pascale vs Sharon Jarvis / Susan Forster6-2, 7-5
2025-02-14vs Worthington / KennedyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hromyak / Kerry Roskopf vs Pat Brennan / Lisa Griffiths6-2, 6-1
2025-02-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesLori Drumtra / Kathleen Hromyak vs Betty Goggin / Eva Migacz6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Sotern / Cheryl Saidel vs Susan Forster / Jane Doe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKerry Roskopf / Karen Pascale vs Jeri Carley / Mary Feldman6-7, 5-7
2025-01-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hromyak / Kerry Roskopf vs Heather Hall / Debra Allen6-3, 6-2
2025-01-10vs Worthington / KennedyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hromyak / Kerry Roskopf vs Lisa Griffiths / Pat Brennan6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Kathleen Hromyak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Kerry Roskopf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.82
Lori Drumtra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cheryl Saidel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Donna Sotern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
2.62
Carolyn Perrault
published 3
Jill McKay
published
Karen Pascale
published
Lisa Byrer
published
MM Phinney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Sotern + Lori Drumtra5946% games−12.8% vs expected
Karen Pascale + Kerry Roskopf213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Hromyak
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Kerry Roskopf
11W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lori Drumtra
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cheryl Saidel
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Donna Sotern
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Alethea Wakefield
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Carolyn Perrault
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.62
Jill McKay
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Pascale
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Byrer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MM Phinney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.