Teams

Kolody

2024 Adult 18 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-06vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobert Doig / Derek Miller vs Jacob Zierenberg / Mike Poling2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBlake Maples vs Nick Murray1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Bryer / Bob Guzley vs Mark Duranczyk / Brian Harbeck6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeoff Miller / Dennis Harness vs John Jonovich / Arthur Moorhead2-6, 2-6
2024-04-06vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Kolody / Blake Maples vs Hugh Salisbury / Mark Duranczyk4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGeoff Miller / Robin Bryer vs Arthur Moorhead / Steve Cremin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Harness / Robert Doig vs Mark Kaiser / John Jonovich5-7, 3-6
2024-03-23vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MWon 21
L#1 DoublesGeoff Miller / Bob Guzley vs Nick Murray / Jacob Zierenberg1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBlake Maples vs Mike Poling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Doig / Dennis Harness vs Mark Kaiser / Hugh Salisbury6-3, 7-5
2024-03-23vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesBob Guzley / Robert Doig vs Nick Murray / David Logan0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRuss Blunck vs Jacob Zierenberg2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Harness / Geoff Miller vs Kenneth Martin / Josh Walker3-6, 0-6
2024-03-02vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobert Doig / Blake Maples vs Jacob Zierenberg / Kenneth Martin4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Kolody vs Mark Duranczyk4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Chan / Russ Blunck vs Nick Murray / David Logan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Harness / Geoff Miller vs Mark Kaiser / Hugh Salisbury1-6, 3-6
2024-03-02vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesRobert Doig / Michael Chan vs Nick Murray / Jacob Zierenberg4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRuss Blunck vs Kenneth Martin6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Kolody / Bob Guzley vs Brian Harbeck / Mike Poling3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBlake Maples / Dennis Harness vs Arthur Moorhead / Steve Cremin3-6, 4-6
2024-02-25vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Maples / Michael Chan vs Scott van Vleet / Brian Harbeck3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBlake Maples vs Josh Walker6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Doig / Bob Guzley vs Bill Bartling / David Logan6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRuss Blunck / Robin Bryer vs Mark Kaiser / Hugh Salisbury6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-25vs NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesBob Guzley / Michael Chan vs Jacob Zierenberg / Kenneth Martin3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRuss Blunck vs Mike Poling4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Maples / Blake Maples vs Scott van Vleet / John Jonovich6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGeoff Miller / John Kolody vs Arthur Moorhead / Steve Cremin3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NAZ 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Murray/18 & over/3.5M7124818224
2Kolody1782451339

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
David Maples
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Blake Maples
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Geoff Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Bob Guzley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Robert Doig
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.12
John Kolody
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Russ Blunck
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Robin Bryer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Dennis Harness
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Takefumi Hirai
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Harness + Geoff Miller033 matchesnot enough data
Robin Bryer + Russ Blunck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Maples
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Blake Maples
4W–6L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Geoff Miller
2W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Bob Guzley
29W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Robert Doig
15W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
John Kolody
62W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Russ Blunck
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Robin Bryer
36W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Dennis Harness
1W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Takefumi Hirai
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.