Teams

Jones/Austin-CC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-17vs Johnson-CCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRuthie Hite / Patti Brooks vs Carmita Duke / Pearlie Jenkins5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmanda Teat vs Jenny Savage1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBelinda Shively / Melodie Broderick vs Lisa Dupree / MaryCatherine Bowers6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRuth Curtis / Donna Akin vs Andrea Bingham / Amy Forsyth6-4, 7-5
2025-04-13vs Jones/Galbraith-GILost 05
L#1 DoublesBelinda Shively / Melodie Broderick vs Sue Goldman / Sherry Bunn6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClaire Fairchild vs Michelle Jones2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn English / Janet Jenkins vs Lynn Averett / Elizabeth Borom5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatti Brooks / Tracy Smith vs Kristen Lane / Lori Turner4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesDonna Akin / Pauline Marth vs Paula Watkins / Sarah Fletcher5-7, 6-7
2025-04-05vs CORTA/Sheila EzellLost 14
L#1 DoublesKathryn English / Melodie Broderick vs Jamie Williams / Vicki Hendrix2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Teat vs Carla Hale3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Jones / Ruthie Hite vs Sheila Ezell / Michelle Beach1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Smith / Patti Brooks vs Lisa Pawlowski / Pam Knight0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesPegi Williams / Pauline Marth vs Jenny Weekley / Rene Roberts4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Amanda Teat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Belinda Shively
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Kathryn English
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Melodie Broderick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Ruth Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Joi Liscar
published
2.84
Cathy Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Ruthie Hite
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Pauline Marth
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Claire Fairchild
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Pegi Williams
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Donna Akin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Robin King
published
Pamela Burt
published
Patti Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Belinda Shively + Melodie Broderick5450% games+3.0% vs expected
Ruthie Hite + Belinda Shively3249% games+2.4% vs expected
Donna Akin + Kathryn English0526% games−19.7% vs expected
Ruth Curtis + Donna Akin224 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Curtis + Cathy Jones404 matchesnot enough data
Melodie Broderick + Kathryn English134 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Burt + Ruth Curtis213 matchesnot enough data
Pauline Marth + Donna Akin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Teat
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Belinda Shively
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kathryn English
4W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Melodie Broderick
16W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Ruth Curtis
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Joi Liscar
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
3
Cathy Jones
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Ruthie Hite
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Pauline Marth
0W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.82
3
Claire Fairchild
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Pegi Williams
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Donna Akin
10W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Robin King
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Pamela Burt
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Brooks
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.