Teams

MT TAM RC 18AW3.5A-DT

2024 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Hanae Stansvik
published
3.55
Shannon Rajewski
published
3.46
3.44
Paula Loeffler
published
3.44
Ilana Roth
published
3.42
Laura Bradley
published
3.32
Mary Schattenberg
published
3.31
Chenin Kenig
published 3.5
Adriana Cox
published 3.5
Anya Bosina
published 3.5
3.21
Sheri Yu
published
3.04
Jennifer Dal Bozzo
published
2.90
Kathleen Walsh
published
2.82
Alison Fisker
published 3
Jennifer Sterne
published
Michelle Rau
published
Vicki Gross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Dal Bozzo + Paula Loeffler134 matchesnot enough data
Hanae Stansvik + Shannon Rajewski224 matchesnot enough data
Chenin Kenig + Ilana Roth033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Schattenberg + Alison Fisker123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Rajewski + Ilana Roth303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Bradley + Ilana Roth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hanae Stansvik
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Shannon Rajewski
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Urmila Bajpai-Pillai
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
Paula Loeffler
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Ilana Roth
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Laura Bradley
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Mary Schattenberg
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Chenin Kenig
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Adriana Cox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Anya Bosina
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheri Yu
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Dal Bozzo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kathleen Walsh
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Alison Fisker
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Jennifer Sterne
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Rau
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vicki Gross
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.