Teams

Indy A18 4.0M TUE WIRC Bruner

Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-28vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE CRC KovalWon 21
W#1 DoublesTodd Meeks / Paul Musson vs Frank Perconte / Claudio Troncoso6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Schmidt vs Bryce Sadler3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMicah Lacefield / Matthew Ruckman vs Vitaliy Koval / David Winter6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-21vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE IRCD SinghWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Hays / Larry Stropes vs Damon Grothe / JASON RICHMOND7-6, 2-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMicah Lacefield vs Michael Kenny7-5, 0-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Brown / Michael Rothbaum vs Joe Copeland / Cliff Dickinson6-2, 6-4
2026-02-14vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE IUTC PiekarskyWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Musson / Larry Stropes vs Jeremy Gray / Mark Ochsner7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTodd Meeks vs Tom Monroe6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMartin Bruner / Michael Rothbaum vs Colton Butcher / Daniel Piekarsky6-4, 6-4
2026-02-03vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE IRCD BocadeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJason Hays / Matthew Ruckman vs Alexander Buscaglia / Avery Schmidt2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMicah Lacefield vs Michael Surak4-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesMartin Bruner / Larry Stropes vs Nick Bantz / Jeffrey Curry4-6, 2-6
2026-01-20vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE WIRC WinnLost 03
L#1 DoublesMicah Lacefield / Matthew Ruckman vs Joshua Ruse / Patrick Toth3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJason Hays vs Daniel Licari3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Rothbaum / John Schmidt vs Joash Suryavanshi / Benjamin Housh1-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE CRC HusmannLost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan Brown / Paul Musson vs Josh Husmann / Ryan Seale0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Ruckman vs Adam Herstig3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMartin Bruner / Todd Meeks vs David Kupinski / Jeff Springer7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-10vs Indy A18 4.0M TUE IHP DoehrmannLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Brown / Paul Musson vs Neil Jeffries / Sean Ferbrache6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMartin Bruner vs David Hu4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Schmidt / Todd Meeks vs Ryan Page / Marco Vasquez3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · CITA Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Men, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy A18 4.0M TUE CRC Husmann6117413158
2Indy A18 4.0M TUE IUTC Piekarsky6114720187
3Indy A18 4.0M SUN IRCD Gupta5111717150
4Indy A18 4.0M TUE IRCD Bocade5213819174
5Indy A18 4.0M TUE WIRC Winn43111023188
6Indy A18 4.0M SUN IND Green3310818159
7Indy A18 4.0M TUE IHP Doehrmann34101124179
8Indy A18 4.0M TUE WIRC Bruner3491227204
9Indy A18 4.0M SUN CRC Nelson1561225169
10Indy A18 4.0M TUE IRCD Singh1661534226
11Indy A18 4.0M TUE CRC Koval0741735223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Paul Musson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Jason Hays
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Larry Stropes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Matthew Ruckman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.61
Bret Loman
published 4
3.56
Martin Bruner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.53
Todd Meeks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.52
Michael Rothbaum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
John Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Micah Lacefield
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bret Loman + Larry Stropes21758% games+1.6% vs expected
Michael Rothbaum + Martin Bruner3846% games+1.2% vs expected
Paul Musson + Todd Meeks9260% games−2.5% vs expected
Martin Bruner + Larry Stropes6448% games−4.3% vs expected
Michael Rothbaum + John Schmidt3448% gamesnot enough data
Paul Musson + Martin Bruner2453% gamesnot enough data
John Schmidt + Martin Bruner2446% gamesnot enough data
Todd Meeks + Martin Bruner134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Musson
56W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Jason Hays
85W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Larry Stropes
38W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Matthew Ruckman
24W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Bret Loman
62W–43L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
Martin Bruner
27W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
Todd Meeks
78W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Michael Rothbaum
24W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.52
John Schmidt
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Micah Lacefield
86W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.