Teams

Larson

2023 Leon Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-10vs Morgan-GatesWon 20
W#2 DoublesLinda Vannoy / Sherry Cady vs Gina Bell / Lori Elliott7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Fang Liang / Askal Ali6-1, 6-0
2023-12-09vs Leon/Warner/Combo18&Over8.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Alvarez / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Michelle de la Valdene / Mary Warner6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTiffany Jones / Sherry Cady vs Morgan Scott / Michelle Eubanks2-6, 4-6
2023-11-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Sherry Cady vs Morgan Scott / Kimberly Damron4-6, 2-6
2023-11-19vs Morgan-GatesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Sherry Cady vs Lori Elliott / Vickie Morgan-Gates6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Leon/Warner/Combo18&Over8.5WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kjellerup / Amy Knight vs Amy Otis / Michelle de la Valdene7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Alvarez / Sherry Cady vs Morgan Scott / Theresa Harrell6-2, 6-4
2023-10-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Alvarez / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Catherine Reid / Gina Bell6-0, 6-0
2023-09-24vs Morgan-GatesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSherry Cady / Tiffany Jones vs Jennifer Winegardner / Joan Bassett4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kjellerup / Susan Alvarez vs Elizabeth Hawkins / Fang Liang6-2, 6-3
2023-09-17vs Leon/Warner/Combo18&Over8.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Alvarez / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Michelle de la Valdene / Morgan Scott6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Larson / Sherry Cady vs Kimberly Damron / Amy Otis7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
3.87
Amy Knight
published 4
3.79
Tiffany Jones
published
3.63
Jennifer Kjellerup
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.41
Sherry Cady
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Jessica Bahorski
published
Susan Alvarez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kjellerup + Sherry Cady13551% games−1.3% vs expected
Jennifer Kjellerup + Jacqueline Larson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Larson
55W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Amy Knight
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Tiffany Jones
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Jennifer Kjellerup
143W–105L career · 12 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sherry Cady
196W–173L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jessica Bahorski
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Alvarez
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.