Teams

Davidson - Pinehurst Resort

Sandhills Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Combo 55 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
Lawn and Tennis Club Of North Carolina
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Pinehurst Tennis Club
Sep 23 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Laura Davidson
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Pinehurst Tennis Club
Oct 7 6:30 PM
Lawn and Tennis Club Of North Carolina
2026-08-12vs Martin - Lawn and Tennis 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Mia Delk vs Anneliese Carr / Yuko Resseguie4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTheresa Roach / Victoria Adkins vs Heidi Stevens / MaryBryan Morgan7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Nannette Goodwin
published 4
3.82
Kristin Lahey
published 4
3.70
3.49
Theresa Roach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Julie Milton
published
3.31
Mia Delk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Victoria Adkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Eileen Carter
published
3.25
Carolyn Voltz
published 3.5
3.01
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Delk + Eileen Carter6262% games+8.4% vs expected
Mia Delk + Victoria Adkins4250% games+5.1% vs expected
Kristin Lahey + Adrianne Leinbach192252% games+0.2% vs expected
Annmarie Anderson + Nannette Goodwin3349% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Voltz + Theresa Roach2348% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Carter + Nannette Goodwin2357% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Adkins + Julie Milton224 matchesnot enough data
Annmarie Anderson + Carolyn Voltz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–204L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Kristin Lahey
190W–166L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–223L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Theresa Roach
91W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Julie Milton
7W–13L career · no lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–303L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Victoria Adkins
41W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Eileen Carter
21W–23L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carolyn Voltz
70W–107L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Annmarie Anderson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.