Teams

MTC - Sands

2025 Combo 18 & Over Men - Mobile · 8.5 Men 18

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-05vs MTC - RyanLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Corey / Jimmy Alford vs John O'Brien / Jason Brannon3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Trice / Reggie Oyler vs Jason Antoine / Joey Campbell4-6, 6-7
2025-07-15vs MTC - RyanLost 03
L#1 DoublesReggie Oyler / Reshad Bell vs Jason Antoine / Anthony Nguyen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Trice / Spencer Nunn vs Les Steiner / Wes Steiner2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKenny Sands / Bryan Cooper vs Jeremy Tapper / Jason Brannon3-6, 1-6
2025-06-17vs MTC - RyanLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenny Sands / JT Hornbuckle vs Matthew Davis / Anthony Nguyen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesReggie Oyler / Jimmy Alford vs Chad Necaise / Johnny Still2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Cooper / Joey Huettemann vs David Ryan / Jack Meador3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Larry Trice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Reshad Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Thomas Lockard
published
3.71
Scott Corey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Reggie Oyler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Jimmy Alford
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.46
Kenny Sands
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Spencer Nunn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Ryan Young
published
3.13
JT Hornbuckle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Joey Huettemann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Bryan Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Lockard + Kenny Sands0533% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larry Trice
0W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Reshad Bell
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Thomas Lockard
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Scott Corey
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.71
Reggie Oyler
20W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Jimmy Alford
16W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Kenny Sands
10W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.46
Spencer Nunn
20W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Ryan Young
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
JT Hornbuckle
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Joey Huettemann
27W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Bryan Cooper
11W–17L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.