Teams

SD 3.0WD Coronado HS (2:3)/ Anderson

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesLyle Anderson / Marisa Kelly Jung vs Claudia Garcia / Kristi Gottlieb3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTara Toohey vs Veronica Acuna4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Castiglione / Jaelyn Frey vs Karina Contreras / Alejandra Teran2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Oreardon vs Tatiana Sotres3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Pettit / Elizabeth Riebe vs Carla Herrera / Laura Vargas6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Marisa Kelly Jung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Krysta McRae
published
2.69
Lainie Reuter
published
2.66
Cory Stege
published 3
2.64
Courtney Castiglione
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Leslie Harrison
published
2.55
Lyle Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Margaret Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Elizabeth Riebe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Leslie Vinton
published
Beth Oreardon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Jaelyn Frey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Meagan McCreery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Toohey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lainie Reuter + Lyle Anderson3440% games−3.0% vs expected
Courtney Castiglione + Cory Stege213 matchesnot enough data
Lyle Anderson + Cory Stege123 matchesnot enough data
Cory Stege + Krysta McRae303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marisa Kelly Jung
22W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Krysta McRae
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Lainie Reuter
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cory Stege
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Courtney Castiglione
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Leslie Harrison
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lyle Anderson
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Margaret Pettit
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Elizabeth Riebe
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Leslie Vinton
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Beth Oreardon
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jaelyn Frey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meagan McCreery
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tara Toohey
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.