Teams

Deuces

2021 Tri-Level Women · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-10-20vs Team DVBWon 20
W#1 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Christa Ancri vs Wendi Cohen / Jan Hoth3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Cuffaro / Jill Markovits vs Sarah MacKay / Dorothy Logan7-5, 6-0
2020-10-13vs Inside OutLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Basta / Jill Markovits vs Kimberly Ajavananda / Janet Himstead6-7, 2-4, 0-1
2020-10-11vs Team DVBWon 21
L#1 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Christa Ancri vs Wendi Cohen / Anna Hill2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Cuffaro / Jill Markovits vs Sarah MacKay / Hazel-Ann Rodney7-5, 4-3
W#3 DoublesAbigail Mulligan / Jennifer Basta vs Catherine Linenberg / Sherla Glasgow6-1, 6-0
2020-10-06vs NJ: Union LobstersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Brougham / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Teresa Murphy / Lisa Engel6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Markovits / Trudy Cederqvist vs Deborah Rogut / Linda Tomasetti6-1, 6-2
2020-09-22vs Inside OutWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Mayer / Christa Ancri vs Maritza Dominguez / Kate Seaman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Maria Coradini / Dana Estes6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Basta / Abigail Mulligan vs Madalena Sociedade / Joanne Stoy6-1, 6-0
2020-09-15vs NJ: Union LobstersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Wendy Mayer vs Yoonhee Kang / Jayamadhuri Ghosh2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Cuffaro / Jill Markovits vs Teresa Murphy / Patricia Vaughan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Christa Ancri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Wendy Mayer
published
3.39
Lindsay Cuffaro
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Jill Markovits
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Abigail Mulligan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trudy Cederqvist
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Cuffaro + Jill Markovits11266% games+7.4% vs expected
Lindsay Cuffaro + Trudy Cederqvist241259% games+4.5% vs expected
Trudy Cederqvist + Jill Markovits5556% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christa Ancri
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Wendy Mayer
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.54
Lindsay Cuffaro
113W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jill Markovits
93W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Abigail Mulligan
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Trudy Cederqvist
106W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.