Teams

BSF:Polhamus/Neville

2025 NCT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-27vs FV:Ad-Ins:Bowman/WiskirchenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Stapleton / Kristine Blaha vs Ryan Scafuri / Rachel Buchanan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Schuler / Mia Wallack vs Robert Bodenburg / Lesia Comperatore2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVincent Celentano / Danielle Coccomo vs Anthony Riccio / Lisa Riccio7-6, 6-6
W#1 DoublesSam Strong / Kristine Blaha vs Dan Michaud / Esther McNany6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBrian Schuler / Judy Schuler vs John Henderson / Paola Rubino3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJames Stapleton / Diane Duxin vs Emily Dawkins / Alejandro Almazan6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesRebecca Fausel / Sam Strong vs Peter Koo / Jade Schoenfeld1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Schuler / Judy Schuler vs Edward Avery / Laura O'Brien5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesStuart Burwood / Isabela Piza Danielsen vs Huanran Musick / Seth Huttner6-3, 7-5
2025-03-09vs FV:Ad-Ins:Bowman/WiskirchenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSam Strong / Rebecca Fausel vs Thomas Scafuri / Meg Castineiras5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Bastiaanse / Danielle Coccomo vs Ryan Scafuri / Willi Bowman0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Stapleton / Judy Schuler vs Anthony Riccio / Lisa Riccio5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Polhamus / Patia Haverty vs Xia Lu / Tod Robberson6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVincent Celentano / Mia Wallack vs Stephanie Gaidos / Sergio Alio0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Schuler / Judy Schuler vs Feng Chen / Julia Schoenfeld6-2, 6-6
2025-02-09vs MLM:Lincer/Won 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Polhamus / Suzanne Neville vs Jeffrey Smith / Melinda Smith6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSam Strong / Diane Duxin vs Americo Rodrigues / Tina Rodrigues6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJesper Andersen / Isabela Piza Danielsen vs Natong Lin / Lior Grubert1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Polhamus / Louisa Hogan vs Steve Wargat / Elizabeth Heinze2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMolly Pietrantonio / Vincent Celentano vs Joy Fausey / Alejandro Almazan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Fausel / Rebecca Fausel vs Esther McNany / Dan Michaud3-6, 2-6
2025-01-26vs MLM:Lincer/Won 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Polhamus / Rebecca Fausel vs Melinda Smith / Jeffrey Smith6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSam Strong / Patia Haverty vs Randy Miller / Roberta Pratt6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStuart Burwood / Mia Wallack vs Kyle Contente / Alexandra Pagoni6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSF:Match Makers:Abreu/Nguyen0814924206
2EHTC:Court Crushers:Chen/Hill08111125212
3EHTC:The Internationals 18+:DeJuan/Dawkins08121227229
4FV:Ad-Ins:Bowman/Wiskirchen08111330223
5BSF:Polhamus/Neville08101430241
6BTC:Tortured Tennis Dept:Griffith/0920618190
7FV:Sir Mixed-a-lot:Pérez/Yaffee0917921210
8RH:HeSaid_SheSaid:Oikonomou/Oikonomou09121535264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Stuart Burwood
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Suzanne Neville
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Brian Schuler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Rebecca Fausel
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Louisa Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Kristine Blaha
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Daniel Polhamus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Patia Haverty
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Danielle Coccomo
published 3.5
3.23
Judy Schuler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Sam Strong
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.17
Matt Bastiaanse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Molly Pietrantonio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Isabela Piza Danielsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Diane Duxin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Lawrence Klobutcher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Vincent Celentano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
David Fausel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Mia Wallack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
James Stapleton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jesper Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Neville + Stuart Burwood5160% games+15.0% vs expected
Daniel Polhamus + Kristine Blaha4258% games+10.8% vs expected
Mia Wallack + Stuart Burwood8458% games+1.3% vs expected
Daniel Polhamus + Louisa Hogan7851% games−0.0% vs expected
Daniel Polhamus + Suzanne Neville111153% games−4.5% vs expected
Judy Schuler + Brian Schuler8950% games−8.6% vs expected
Patia Haverty + Daniel Polhamus1646% games−14.9% vs expected
Rebecca Fausel + David Fausel2543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stuart Burwood
105W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Suzanne Neville
161W–145L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Brian Schuler
25W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Rebecca Fausel
28W–39L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Louisa Hogan
199W–194L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kristine Blaha
88W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Daniel Polhamus
88W–108L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Patia Haverty
80W–106L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Danielle Coccomo
60W–47L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Schuler
36W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Sam Strong
33W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Matt Bastiaanse
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Molly Pietrantonio
111W–103L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Isabela Piza Danielsen
45W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3.5
Diane Duxin
9W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Lawrence Klobutcher
56W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Vincent Celentano
24W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
David Fausel
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Mia Wallack
38W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
James Stapleton
35W–71L career · 8 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Jesper Andersen
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.