Teams

Fred Wells Farley 12:30pm

2026 Woman's Daytime Singles · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-03-11vs ICT Buchmeier 12:00pmSplit 22
W#1 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Chelsea Karkula6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Cassie Wilkins6-4, 4-2
L#4 SinglesKristin Dyrhaug vs Lee Blons6-7, 1-3
L#5 SinglesSue Ensign vs Kerry Hinze4-6, 6-6
2026-02-25vs Williston Raschiatore 11:00amLost 13
L#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Nicole Thomas1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Tessa Visser1-6, 0-6
W#4 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Fotini Donnelly7-5, 4-3
L#5 SinglesSue Ensign vs Julie Lang0-6, 4-6
2026-02-11vs Fred Wells Lunka 9:30amWon 32
L#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Erin Udell0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Pauline Bangma6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Linda Coetzee6-2, 6-4
L#5 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Kimberly Miller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#6 SinglesSue Ensign vs Lakoda Willl6-4, 5-4
2026-01-28vs MTC Swanson 9:30amWon 32
W#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Katie Benson6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Amy Crowther6-4, 4-2
W#4 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Lisa Sheppard Pearson6-2, 6-0
L#5 SinglesKristin Dyrhaug vs Lindsay McCarthy3-6, 5-3
L#6 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Susan Johnson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-12-10vs ICT Stark 9:30amLost 04
L#1 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Renee Maul3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Jennifer Hutson1-6, 5-6
L#4 SinglesKristin Dyrhaug vs Kelli Westenberg4-6, 3-6
L#5 SinglesSue Ensign vs Anna-Kjersten Fors0-6, 5-7
2025-11-19vs Williston Carlson 12:30pmLost 14
L#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Kelley Hedge2-6, 5-5
L#2 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Anne Dean3-6, 2-5
L#3 SinglesWendi Kelly vs Tatiana Bremer4-6, 3-3
W#4 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Tammy Emick6-4, 6-3
L#6 SinglesSue Ensign vs Sara Goldfine3-6, 0-6
2025-11-12vs MTC Britzius 12:30 pmWon 41
L#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Tara Swanholm6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Sheryl Tufo6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWendi Kelly vs Susan Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#4 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Judith Landrum6-4, 6-3
W#6 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Anne Gallagher7-6, 5-2
2025-10-29vs ICT Petersen 10:30amWon 41
W#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Margaret Gildner6-0, 4-0
W#2 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Courtney Hunter6-0, 6-3
W#4 SinglesKristin Dyrhaug vs Margaret Reid3-6, 5-2
W#5 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Alyssa Pankratz7-6, 6-0
L#6 SinglesSue Ensign vs Krista Olsen6-7, 4-5
2025-10-15vs ICT Buchmeier 12:00pmWon 32
W#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Chelsea Karkula6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Jodi Ayres4-6, 0-6
W#4 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Kerry Hinze6-1, 6-2
W#5 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Cassie Wilkins6-1, 6-3
L#6 SinglesSue Ensign vs Lee Blons4-6, 4-4
2025-10-01vs Williston Raschiatore 11:00amLost 05
L#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Hana Ryman2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesWendi Kelly vs Nicole Thomas0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSue Ensign vs Julie Lang5-7, 2-6
L#4 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Tessa Visser1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#6 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Fotini Donnelly1-6, 2-6
2025-09-17vs Fred Wells Lunka 9:30amWon 41
L#1 SinglesWendi Kelly vs Pauline Bangma2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAdena Borodkin vs Kimberly Miller6-1, 6-0
W#4 SinglesPatoa Belgam vs Lori Dossett6-0, 7-5
W#5 SinglesKristin Dyrhaug vs Dana Winkler6-3, 4-2
W#6 SinglesLinda Pavic vs Lakoda Willl6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Williston Carlson 12:30pm121631531458
2Fred Wells Farley 12:30pm76354383644
3Fred Wells Lunka 9:30am76403884647
4ICT Stark 9:30am49314791694
5MTC Britzius 12:30 pm492751106731

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Patoa Belgam
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #4 Singles 29% · published
2.97
Paula Bach
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Adena Borodkin
usually #4 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3
2.77
Wendi Kelly
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Kristin Dyrhaug
usually #4 Singles 60%, also #5 Singles 40% · published
2.70
Sue Ensign
usually #6 Singles 50%, also #5 Singles 38% · published
2.63
Linda Pavic
usually #6 Singles 44%, also #5 Singles 33% · published
2.50
Tiffany Liebert
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jackson Farley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patoa Belgam
10W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Paula Bach
18W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Adena Borodkin
11W–3L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Wendi Kelly
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Kristin Dyrhaug
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Sue Ensign
3W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Linda Pavic
6W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Tiffany Liebert
10W–21L career · 12 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jackson Farley
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.