Teams

N OR-THPRD-Corrales

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Sandy Mach
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.44
Shilpa Nanja
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results13 ties
2025-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Liu / Shilpa Nanja vs Carleen McKillop / Amber Wright6-1, 6-3
2025-08-08Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Liu / Shilpa Nanja vs Anuradha Nandagiri / Maryna Kosau6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSandy Mach vs Yunda Huang6-4, 6-1
2025-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Mach / Angie Corrales vs Samara Laynor / Dawn Umstot6-1, 6-4
2025-06-29Split 11
W#1 DoublesSandy Mach / Angie Corrales vs Annie Lamb / Lindsay Jenkins6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMaggie Ma / Shilpa Nanja vs Anca Ilau / Cheri Mosbrucker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Mach vs Lisa Hagerman6-3, 6-1
2025-06-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Mach vs Molly Tanen6-4, 6-1
2025-06-01Won 20
W#1 SinglesSandy Mach vs Terra Thomas6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChloe Wu / Shilpa Nanja vs Kathryn Kuntz / Elisa Spano6-1, 6-2
2025-05-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Mach / Angie Corrales vs Heidi Seinige / Michelle Hodges6-1, 7-5
2025-05-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChloe Wu / Shilpa Nanja vs Hanna Danielson / Dana Valverde4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Mach vs Elyse Wilson6-4, 6-2
2025-05-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Mach / Angie Corrales vs Tammy Parsons / Jennifer Gwin6-0, 6-0
2025-04-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesAngie Corrales / Sandy Mach vs Katrina Miller / Katie Leathers6-0, 6-0
2025-04-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRyann Hulme / Shilpa Nanja vs Roxanna Johnson / Julie Poetsch6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Sandy Mach
25W–7L career
0%46%54%
3.12
3
Shilpa Nanja
4W–11L career
52%48%0%
2.44

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.