Teams

BC-AltaVista/TeresaCampbell

2024 ADULT 55 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
JULIE MOORE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Debbie Graves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Denise Vega
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Teresa Campbell
published
3.70
Anne Hirata
published 4
3.68
Christeen Field
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Susan Raifman
published
3.64
Victoria Alsina
published
Heidi Grimm
published
Karen Chan
published
Karin Chafetz
published
Michelle Alford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nikki Nance
published
Randi Young
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Victoria Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Vega + Christeen Field71052% gamesnot enough data
JULIE MOORE + Christeen Field4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JULIE MOORE
97W–63L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Debbie Graves
69W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Denise Vega
52W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Teresa Campbell
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Anne Hirata
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christeen Field
95W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Susan Raifman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Victoria Alsina
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Heidi Grimm
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Chan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karin Chafetz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Alford
69W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Randi Young
46W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Wright
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.