Teams

Trice

2021 Adult 40 & Over · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-09vs BostickLost 04
L#1 DoublesRoxy Trice / Mary Moore vs Renea Harbert / Padmaja Suresh2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMartille Elias vs Melissa Upson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Smout / Christina Candelario vs Eauclaire Caradine Shelby / Anita Castagna7-6, 2-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNina Bastow / Amy Hobbs vs Briana Bostick / Mariana Fernandes2-6, 3-6
2021-08-02vs AlbrechtLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Kennedy / Mary Moore vs Rose Albrecht / MICHELLE WHERRY6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Jacobsen / Nina Bastow vs April Kutheis / Norma Prifti1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Candelario / Roxy Trice vs Chris Beckner / Robin Brown4-6, 6-6
2021-07-27vs Katz/CoomesLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Hobbs / Laura Kennedy vs Tara Frate / Erica Rosen-McGinnis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMartille Elias / Christina Candelario vs Cherylle Katz / Maria Coomes4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMary Moore / Jennifer Caton vs Yvonne LaJeunesse / Diane Bleyer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-19vs StaroscikSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMary Moore / Jennifer Caton vs Cathy Chu / Emily Louise Hasson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnn Choomack vs Adele Ayres6-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesChristina Candelario / Martille Elias vs Terri Staten / Barbara Kahn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Jacobsen / Lisa Smout vs Margaret Andreas / Suzanne Beck6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-12vs Rhoads/WoodsLost 04
L#1 DoublesJenny Dunn / Martille Elias vs Barbara Rieder / Rochelle Moore2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPatti Holzer vs Judy Newlin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Hobbs / Lisa Smout vs Jeanne Thayer / Judy Malpiedi3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Choomack / Nina Bastow vs Mary Shadrach / Dianna Willis2-6, 1-6
2021-07-06vs Adams/WhiteWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Moore / Laura Kennedy vs Juli van Hook / Michelle Whitson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRoxy Trice / Jenny Dunn vs Kimberly LoPiccolo / Katie White5-7, 1-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Jacobsen / Jennifer Caton vs Rita Ann Jana / Deborah Crittenden6-3, 7-5
2021-06-21vs Peterson/GainesLost 13
L#1 DoublesPatti Holzer / Nancy Jacobsen vs Dawn Weinstock / TRISHA VERSTAPPEN1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Caton vs Jamie Hansen1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNina Bastow / Mary Moore vs Maureen Strasheim / Patti Rensch6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Candelario / Roxy Trice vs Paula Bauer / Lori Moser2-6, 4-6
2021-06-14vs STL/Handley/Fikes/40&Over3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesRoxy Trice / Christina Candelario vs Nancy Kraemer / Erica Yalavarthi4-6, 2-4
L#1 SinglesAnn Choomack vs Laura Boeker0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Kennedy / Mary Moore vs Shannon Bryan / Lauren Meyer6-7, 2-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJenny Dunn / Martille Elias vs Amy Fikes / Mary Handley5-7, 5-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Christina Candelario
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Martille Elias
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.90
Laura Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Nina Bastow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Lisa Smout
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Ann Choomack
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Jennifer Caton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Roxy Trice
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Amy Hobbs
published
Jenny Dunn
published
Mary Moore
published
Patti Holzer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martille Elias + Mary Moore17363% games+10.0% vs expected
Laura Kennedy + Jenny Dunn8161% games+7.9% vs expected
Nina Bastow + Lisa Smout4254% games+2.9% vs expected
Roxy Trice + Christina Candelario033 matchesnot enough data
Martille Elias + Laura Kennedy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Candelario
90W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
Martille Elias
80W–58L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Laura Kennedy
138W–92L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Nina Bastow
52W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
Lisa Smout
32W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Ann Choomack
11W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Jennifer Caton
34W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
2.58
Roxy Trice
7W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
2.35
Amy Hobbs
17W–31L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jenny Dunn
18W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Moore
79W–62L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patti Holzer
22W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.