Teams

Many Happy Returns

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-18vs Sweet ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Enslow / Mary Gail Sullivan vs Darcy Kovacs / Kellie Saville4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJudith Duryea / Dorothy Warner vs Janice Schenk / Cindy Woods6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDwanna Landrum / Jennie Reilly vs Carol van Tuinen / Joanne Beaird6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-18vs Twisted SistersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennie Reilly / Mary Gail Sullivan vs Sally Lentz / Pam Small5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDorothy Warner / Judith Duryea vs Carla Luck / Judy Klein6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDwanna Landrum / Mary Milkovich vs Laurel Farrell / Karen Spierling6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-17vs Wide Open AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDorothy Warner / Judith Duryea vs Suzanne Taylor / Annelise Torgerson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Enslow / Jennie Reilly vs Julie Shaw / Marie Neergaard6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDwanna Landrum / Mary Milkovich vs Kathryn Sullivan / Kelley Dowdell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-16vs Montana Gold DiggersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennie Reilly / Mary Gail Sullivan vs Elizabeth Suh / Terri Ruthruff6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDorothy Warner / Judith Duryea vs Neidra Thomas / Kelly Milligan7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDwanna Landrum / Michelle Enslow vs Lori Abbott / Paula Vernon6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dorothy Warner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Dwanna Landrum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennie Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Judith Duryea
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Gail Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Milkovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Enslow
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Duryea + Dorothy Warner7456% games−6.8% vs expected
Dwanna Landrum + Mary Milkovich3840% gamesnot enough data
Dwanna Landrum + Dorothy Warner123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Gail Sullivan + Jennie Reilly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dorothy Warner
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Dwanna Landrum
19W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennie Reilly
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Judith Duryea
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Gail Sullivan
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Milkovich
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Enslow
32W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.