Teams

BC-Kramer/ChristopherBall

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-09vs BC-MCC/MelissaReadyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / David Cobb vs Joi Gillam / John Carpino6-3, 6-2
2023-07-08vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / AJ Poulin vs Celeste Torres / SAL DEGUZMAN7-6, 6-4
2023-06-10vs BC-ElDorado/JohnTuppalLost 01
L#1 DoublesTanya Drawer / Damian Laurey vs Anne Pila / Sam Yoo4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Jennifer Giordano
published
3.54
Tanya Drawer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Christian Capper
published 3.5
3.36
David Cobb
published 3.5
3.32
Christine Ball
published 3.5
3.30
Tracey Cloud
published
3.26
Damian Laurey
published 3.5
David Bradley
published 3.5
3.25
Colleen Post
published 3.5
3.17
AJ Poulin
published 3.5
3.15
Pamela Tansavatdi
published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robarts
published
3.12
Martha Zane
published
3.09
Christopher Ball
published 3.5
3.07
Lynn Abelson
published 3.5
2.92
Todd Springer
published
2.76
John Abelson
published
2.71
Amrita Desai
published 3
Joyce Nikolic
published
Tom Plotts
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Giordano
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Tanya Drawer
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Christian Capper
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
David Cobb
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Christine Ball
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Tracey Cloud
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Damian Laurey
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
David Bradley
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Post
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
AJ Poulin
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Pamela Tansavatdi
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Sarah Robarts
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Martha Zane
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christopher Ball
2W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Lynn Abelson
49W–79L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Todd Springer
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
John Abelson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Amrita Desai
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Joyce Nikolic
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Plotts
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.