Teams

SATA/Robert Malinowski

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Men) - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-06vs The Landings - PucciniLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartin Zellerer / James Dodson vs Greg Killeen / John Mauro2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Men) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATA/Robert Malinowski5315921182
2The Landings - Puccini44111327192
3SCC - Harper35101433240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Albert Day
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.89
Chris Lowry
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Royston Tedder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.83
Tim Albert
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.82
Stephen Craig Burns
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.81
Robert Malinowski
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
3.78
Gregory Nelms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Hall
published 4
3.65
Wes Tedder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
James Dodson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Martin Zellerer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Royston Tedder + Wes Tedder5354% games+8.9% vs expected
Robert Malinowski + Tim Albert4263% gamesnot enough data
Robert Malinowski + Albert Day123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Day
91W–43L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Chris Lowry
10W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Royston Tedder
43W–28L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Tim Albert
22W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Stephen Craig Burns
13W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Robert Malinowski
48W–30L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Gregory Nelms
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Chris Hall
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wes Tedder
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
James Dodson
25W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Martin Zellerer
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.